93 2002-11-29 16:38:40 +0000 Be more consistent with URIs in the UI 2002-11-30 16:46:20 +0000 1 1 1 Unclassified Validator check 0.6.0 Other other RESOLVED FIXED http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=http://www.w3.org/Encryption/ P3 minor --- 1 ville.skytta ville.skytta oldest_to_newest 205 0 ville.skytta 2002-11-29 16:38:40 +0000 The example URI <http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=http://www.w3.org/Encryption/> contains three differently output URIs. 1) The redirection note 2) The "The document located at ..." part 3) In the bottom, the revalidation URI I suggest that we use the way recommended in RFC2396, appendix E for all URIs: <http://foo.bar.com/...> ...or in HTML: &lt;<a href="http://foo.bar.com/...">http://foo.bar.com/...</a>%gt; Again, feel free to assign to me if you agree. 206 1 ville.skytta 2002-11-29 16:39:18 +0000 Duh, &gt; of course. 208 2 link 2002-11-29 17:04:17 +0000 Personally I prefer the old RFC1738 syntax (<URL:...>), but I can live with either one so long as they are consistent. Good catch BTW. :-) 217 3 ville.skytta 2002-11-30 11:46:20 +0000 Done, using the RFC2396 style :)