9072 2010-02-18 17:03:04 +0000 There's inconsistent quoting of attributes between the highlighted and non-highlited parts of this section 2010-10-04 13:55:31 +0000 1 1 1 Unclassified HTML WG pre-LC1 HTML5 spec (editor: Ian Hickson) unspecified Other other RESOLVED WONTFIX http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/#configuring-o-form-to-communicate-with-a-server P3 normal LC 1 contributor ian ian mike public-html-admin public-html-wg-issue-tracking s+w3bugs public-html-bugzilla oldest_to_newest 32407 0 contributor 2010-02-18 17:03:04 +0000 Section: http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/#configuring-o-form-to-communicate-with-a-server Comment: There's inconsistent quoting of attributes between the highlighted and non-highlited parts of this section Posted from: 69.38.170.232 32657 1 ian 2010-02-25 06:32:24 +0000 EDITOR'S RESPONSE: This is an Editor's Response to your comment. If you are satisfied with this response, please change the state of this bug to CLOSED. If you have additional information and would like the editor to reconsider, please reopen this bug. If you would like to escalate the issue to the full HTML Working Group, please add the TrackerRequest keyword to this bug, and suggest title and text for the tracker issue; or you may create a tracker issue yourself, if you are able to do so. For more details, see this document: http://dev.w3.org/html5/decision-policy/decision-policy.html Status: Did Not Understand Request Change Description: no spec change Rationale: Does it have to be consistent? It's all valid, no? I guess I could quote more of them, or try to come up with some pattern for why things are quoted and why they're not, or something, but... 35873 2 s+w3bugs 2010-05-28 15:27:45 +0000 Even though it's valid, I think that quoting inconsistently sets a bad example for authors. The spec can quote attribute values all the time, or only when required, but the pattern should make sense to someone reading it. 37577 3 ian 2010-08-17 19:01:17 +0000 EDITOR'S RESPONSE: This is an Editor's Response to your comment. If you are satisfied with this response, please change the state of this bug to CLOSED. If you have additional information and would like the editor to reconsider, please reopen this bug. If you would like to escalate the issue to the full HTML Working Group, please add the TrackerRequest keyword to this bug, and suggest title and text for the tracker issue; or you may create a tracker issue yourself, if you are able to do so. For more details, see this document: http://dev.w3.org/html5/decision-policy/decision-policy.html Status: Rejected Change Description: no spec change Rationale: The examples in the spec intentionally use a wide variety of styles to encourage authors to not consider one style more canonical than another. There's really nothing wrong with this example, other than some people might find it better to be more consistent — but other authors might not, and there really is no reason to prefer one over the other.