8997 2010-02-14 07:45:06 +0000 Sections 6 and 7 are informative but appear to give normative requirements 2011-08-04 05:06:02 +0000 1 1 1 Unclassified HTML WG LC1 HTML+RDFa (editor: Manu Sporny) unspecified PC All RESOLVED FIXED P2 normal --- 1 mjs msporny mike msporny public-html-admin public-html-wg-issue-tracking public-html-bugzilla oldest_to_newest 32004 0 mjs 2010-02-14 07:45:06 +0000 Sections 6 and 7 are labeled informative, but appear to give exact rules to follow for extraction via Infoset or DOM. Shouldn't they be normative? 32137 1 msporny 2010-02-16 04:33:28 +0000 RDFA-SPEC-SECTIONS [infoset-based-processors dom-level-2-based-processors] 35366 2 msporny 2010-05-03 03:57:32 +0000 EDITOR'S RESPONSE: This is an Editor's Response to your comment. If you are satisfied with this response, please change the state of this bug to CLOSED. If you have additional information and would like the editor to reconsider, please reopen this bug. If you would like to escalate the issue to the full HTML Working Group, please add the TrackerRequest keyword to this bug, and suggest title and text for the tracker issue; or you may create a tracker issue yourself, if you are able to do so. For more details, see this document: http://dev.w3.org/html5/decision-policy/decision-policy.html Status: Fixed Change Description: Section 6, now section 4.5, has been changed to be normative: http://dev.w3.org/html5/rdfa/drafts/ED-rdfa-in-html-20100502/diff-20100304.html#infoset-based-processors Section 7, now section 4.6, has been changed to be normative: http://dev.w3.org/html5/rdfa/drafts/ED-rdfa-in-html-20100502/diff-20100304.html#dom-level-2-based-processors Rationale: These two sections were informative because we don't want to specify implementation details on how the values are extracted. The language is fairly generic and only discusses the Infoset and DOM2 elements, not parser/processor implementation details. Since there is a SHOULD level requirement, it may not be as dangerous as it started out. Let's try this and see if anyone complains. 53017 3 mike 2011-08-04 05:06:02 +0000 mass-move component to LC1