8994 2010-02-14 07:37:13 +0000 HTML+RDFa will process attributes in the XHML namespace as well as the null namespace; XHTML+RDFa does not 2011-08-04 05:06:16 +0000 1 1 1 Unclassified HTML WG LC1 HTML+RDFa (editor: Manu Sporny) unspecified PC All RESOLVED FIXED P2 normal --- 1 mjs msporny mike msporny public-html-admin public-html-wg-issue-tracking public-html-bugzilla oldest_to_newest 32000 0 mjs 2010-02-14 07:37:13 +0000 Section 6.2 says: "For each RDFa attribute in the [attributes] list that has a [prefix]] with no value or a [prefix] with the value of http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml, extract and use the [normalized value]." However, XHTML+RDFa does not seem to allow the RDFa attributes to be namespace-prefixed at all, they are only processed when in a null namespace: http://www.w3.org/TR/rdfa-syntax/#rdfa-attributes Please remove this inconsistency. 32001 1 mjs 2010-02-14 07:37:36 +0000 Section 7.2 has the same problem. 32134 2 msporny 2010-02-16 04:31:19 +0000 RDFA-SPEC-SECTIONS [processing-rdfa-attributes] 35436 3 msporny 2010-05-05 03:16:40 +0000 EDITOR'S RESPONSE: This is an Editor's Response to your comment. If you are satisfied with this response, please change the state of this bug to CLOSED. If you have additional information and would like the editor to reconsider, please reopen this bug. If you would like to escalate the issue to the full HTML Working Group, please add the TrackerRequest keyword to this bug, and suggest title and text for the tracker issue; or you may create a tracker issue yourself, if you are able to do so. For more details, see this document: http://dev.w3.org/html5/decision-policy/decision-policy.html Status: Fixed Change Description: Removed processing of RDFa attributes in the XHTML namespace. http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/html5/rdfa/drafts/ED-rdfa-in-html-20100504/Overview.html.diff?r1=1.8&r2=1.9&f=h Rationale: I don't believe that it was necessary to process values in the XHTML namespace. Then again, I'm a novice when it comes to these things... Maciej probably knows what he's talking about. :) 53052 4 mike 2011-08-04 05:06:16 +0000 mass-move component to LC1