8988 2010-02-14 07:15:36 +0000 Extensions to HTML5 syntax should be described as extensions, not modifications 2011-08-04 05:06:14 +0000 1 1 1 Unclassified HTML WG LC1 HTML+RDFa (editor: Manu Sporny) unspecified PC All RESOLVED FIXED http://dev.w3.org/html5/rdfa/#extensions-to-the-html5-syntax P2 normal --- 1 mjs msporny mike msporny public-html-admin public-html-wg-issue-tracking public-html-bugzilla oldest_to_newest 31994 0 mjs 2010-02-14 07:15:36 +0000 "There are a few changes that are required to the HTML5 specification in order to fully support RDFa. The following sub-sections outline the necessary modifications to the base HTML5 specification." The additions to the HTML5 syntax should be described as "extensions", not "modifiations". 32128 1 msporny 2010-02-16 04:27:44 +0000 RDFA-SPEC-SECTIONS [extensions-to-the-html5-syntax] 35429 2 msporny 2010-05-05 02:15:07 +0000 EDITOR'S RESPONSE: This is an Editor's Response to your comment. If you are satisfied with this response, please change the state of this bug to CLOSED. If you have additional information and would like the editor to reconsider, please reopen this bug. If you would like to escalate the issue to the full HTML Working Group, please add the TrackerRequest keyword to this bug, and suggest title and text for the tracker issue; or you may create a tracker issue yourself, if you are able to do so. For more details, see this document: http://dev.w3.org/html5/decision-policy/decision-policy.html Status: Fixed Change Description: Changed all instances of "modifications" to "extensions" in the document. http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/html5/rdfa/drafts/ED-rdfa-in-html-20100504/Overview.html.diff?r1=1.4&r2=1.5&f=h Rationale: "Extensions" is less politically charged than "modifications". 53047 3 mike 2011-08-04 05:06:14 +0000 mass-move component to LC1