8980 2010-02-14 06:41:19 +0000 HTML+RDFa has should-/may-level requirements for undefined constructs 2011-08-04 05:06:22 +0000 1 1 1 Unclassified HTML WG LC1 HTML+RDFa (editor: Manu Sporny) unspecified PC All RESOLVED FIXED http://dev.w3.org/html5/rdfa/#document-conformance P2 normal --- 1 mjs msporny mike msporny public-html-admin public-html-wg-issue-tracking public-html-bugzilla oldest_to_newest 31978 0 mjs 2010-02-14 06:41:19 +0000 In Section 3.1 Document Conformance, HTML+RDFa says: 2. There should be a version attribute on the html element. The value of the version attribute should be "HTML+RDFa 1.0" if the document is a non-XML mode document, or "XHTML+RDFa 1.0" if the document is a XML mode document. 3. There may be a link element contained in the head element that contains profile for the the rel attribute and http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml/vocab for the href attribute. Neither @version nor rel=profile are defined by this document, or by HTML5, and there is no normative reference cited which defines them as extensions to HTML5. 32120 1 msporny 2010-02-16 04:23:33 +0000 RDFA-SPEC-SECTIONS [document-conformance] 35356 2 msporny 2010-05-03 02:49:33 +0000 EDITOR'S RESPONSE: This is an Editor's Response to your comment. If you are satisfied with this response, please change the state of this bug to CLOSED. If you have additional information and would like the editor to reconsider, please reopen this bug. If you would like to escalate the issue to the full HTML Working Group, please add the TrackerRequest keyword to this bug, and suggest title and text for the tracker issue; or you may create a tracker issue yourself, if you are able to do so. For more details, see this document: http://dev.w3.org/html5/decision-policy/decision-policy.html Status: Fixed Change Description: rel=profile has been removed from the specification. @version is defined in a new section about the @version attribute http://dev.w3.org/html5/rdfa/drafts/ED-rdfa-in-html-20100502/#the-version-attribute It is also defined in the HTML 4.01 + RDFa 1.1 DTD: http://dev.w3.org/html5/rdfa/drafts/ED-rdfa-in-html-20100502/#the-html-4.01---rdfa-1.1-dtd Rationale: The RDFa WG is no longer considering rel=profile as a versioning solution for RDFa. The @version attribute was normatively defined in the XHTML+RDFa specification in the XHTML+RDFa Driver Module (DTD). HTML+RDFa never specified a DTD - this has been corrected. To make the support and range of @version abundantly clear, "The version attribute" section was added. 35358 3 mjs 2010-05-03 03:08:34 +0000 Thanks, can you please provide a link to the spec diffs (as required by the decision policy)? 35360 4 msporny 2010-05-03 03:26:01 +0000 Sure, does this work for you? http://dev.w3.org/html5/rdfa/drafts/ED-rdfa-in-html-20100502/diff-20100304.html#the-version-attribute http://dev.w3.org/html5/rdfa/drafts/ED-rdfa-in-html-20100502/diff-20100304.html#the-html-4.01---rdfa-1.1-dtd 35369 5 mjs 2010-05-03 05:40:25 +0000 (In reply to comment #4) > Sure, does this work for you? > > http://dev.w3.org/html5/rdfa/drafts/ED-rdfa-in-html-20100502/diff-20100304.html#the-version-attribute > > http://dev.w3.org/html5/rdfa/drafts/ED-rdfa-in-html-20100502/diff-20100304.html#the-html-4.01---rdfa-1.1-dtd That's fine, but this version is sufficient (and possibly better), assuming it's the correct diff: http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/html5/rdfa/Overview.html.diff?r1=1.20&r2=1.21&f=h You should be able to get diffs like that for any spec checkin. Please also add some form of appropriate spec diff links to other recently resolved bugs. 53067 6 mike 2011-08-04 05:06:22 +0000 mass-move component to LC1