8977 2010-02-14 06:31:28 +0000 Some conformance keywords are used prior to the Conformance Requirements section 2011-08-04 05:06:14 +0000 1 1 1 Unclassified HTML WG LC1 HTML+RDFa (editor: Manu Sporny) unspecified PC All RESOLVED FIXED P2 normal --- 1 mjs msporny mike msporny public-html-admin public-html-wg-issue-tracking public-html-bugzilla oldest_to_newest 31975 0 mjs 2010-02-14 06:31:28 +0000 I think it would read better if section 3 Conformance Requirements appeared before any sections that include conformance requirements that use the keywords. Section 2 has a should-level requirement and section 2.1 has some may-level requirements. 32117 1 msporny 2010-02-16 04:21:01 +0000 RDFA-SPEC-SECTIONS [conformance-requirements parsing-model modifying-the-input-document] 35351 2 msporny 2010-05-03 01:11:35 +0000 EDITOR'S RESPONSE: This is an Editor's Response to your comment. If you are satisfied with this response, please change the state of this bug to CLOSED. If you have additional information and would like the editor to reconsider, please reopen this bug. If you would like to escalate the issue to the full HTML Working Group, please add the TrackerRequest keyword to this bug, and suggest title and text for the tracker issue; or you may create a tracker issue yourself, if you are able to do so. For more details, see this document: http://dev.w3.org/html5/decision-policy/decision-policy.html Status: Fixed Change Description: The Conformance Requirements section appears before any normative section now: http://dev.w3.org/html5/rdfa/drafts/ED-rdfa-in-html-20100502/#conformance Rationale: Submitter is correct, this was an oversight. The document should describe the conformance criteria (including how to use MUST, SHOULD, etc) before any normative section. 35361 3 msporny 2010-05-03 03:37:55 +0000 Diff-marked version: http://dev.w3.org/html5/rdfa/drafts/ED-rdfa-in-html-20100502/diff-20100304.html#conformance 53048 4 mike 2011-08-04 05:06:14 +0000 mass-move component to LC1