<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes" ?>
<!DOCTYPE bugzilla SYSTEM "https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/page.cgi?id=bugzilla.dtd">

<bugzilla version="5.0.4"
          urlbase="https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/"
          
          maintainer="sysbot+bugzilla@w3.org"
>

    <bug>
          <bug_id>896</bug_id>
          
          <creation_ts>2004-09-28 13:13:47 +0000</creation_ts>
          <short_desc>&quot;summary mode&quot; can cause browser timeout</short_desc>
          <delta_ts>2004-11-23 20:14:52 +0000</delta_ts>
          <reporter_accessible>1</reporter_accessible>
          <cclist_accessible>1</cclist_accessible>
          <classification_id>1</classification_id>
          <classification>Unclassified</classification>
          <product>LinkChecker</product>
          <component>checklink</component>
          <version>4.0</version>
          <rep_platform>Other</rep_platform>
          <op_sys>other</op_sys>
          <bug_status>RESOLVED</bug_status>
          <resolution>FIXED</resolution>
          
          
          <bug_file_loc></bug_file_loc>
          <status_whiteboard></status_whiteboard>
          <keywords></keywords>
          <priority>P2</priority>
          <bug_severity>normal</bug_severity>
          <target_milestone>4.1</target_milestone>
          
          
          <everconfirmed>1</everconfirmed>
          <reporter name="Olivier Thereaux">ot</reporter>
          <assigned_to name="Olivier Thereaux">ot</assigned_to>
          <cc>ville.skytta</cc>
          
          <qa_contact name="qa-dev tracking">www-validator-cvs</qa_contact>

      

      

      

          <comment_sort_order>oldest_to_newest</comment_sort_order>  
          <long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>2380</commentid>
    <comment_count>0</comment_count>
    <who name="Olivier Thereaux">ot</who>
    <bug_when>2004-09-28 13:13:47 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>The &quot;summary only&quot; mode sends no output while processing all the links. Given how this phase can 
take up to minutes, some browsers consider it as a &quot;server timeout&quot;.

Issue already discussed in 
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-qa-dev/2004Sep/0091.html
but no obvious solution found yet.</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>2532</commentid>
    <comment_count>1</comment_count>
    <who name="Ville Skyttä">ville.skytta</who>
    <bug_when>2004-10-12 21:57:44 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>Candidate fix in CVS:
http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/perl/modules/W3C/LinkChecker/bin/checklink.diff?r1=4.7&amp;r2=4.8&amp;f=h

As discussed in today&apos;s meeting, reassigning to Olivier for the &quot;this may take
some time&quot; message in summary only mode (probably good to have for both cmdline
and CGI).
</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>2604</commentid>
    <comment_count>2</comment_count>
    <who name="Olivier Thereaux">ot</who>
    <bug_when>2004-11-11 03:56:20 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>Will take care of the &quot;this may take some time&quot; message, accepting assignment
 </thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>2605</commentid>
    <comment_count>3</comment_count>
    <who name="Olivier Thereaux">ot</who>
    <bug_when>2004-11-11 06:49:50 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>&quot;this may take some time&quot; message added.

A few tests revealed that although most browsers react well to the &apos;print spaces&apos; hack, others don&apos;t. 
Notably, Mac OSX&apos;s safari doesn&apos;t even start rendering the page (and thus does not show the &quot;this may 
take some time&quot; message) before, apparently, having received &quot;enough&quot; content, and thus fails with a 
timeout error.

Arguably, this is a browser bug, and there is little we can do about it beyond mentioning in the 
documentation that with some browsers, it is safer to not use the &quot;summary only&quot; option... 

Your thoughts?</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>2609</commentid>
    <comment_count>4</comment_count>
    <who name="Ville Skyttä">ville.skytta</who>
    <bug_when>2004-11-12 20:05:29 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>Ok, let&apos;s just document it now and get 4.1 out, and keep eyes open for better
implementations/workarounds in the future.</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>2647</commentid>
    <comment_count>5</comment_count>
    <who name="Ville Skyttä">ville.skytta</who>
    <bug_when>2004-11-23 20:14:52 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>Comment 3 noted in the docs.</thetext>
  </long_desc>
      
      

    </bug>

</bugzilla>