8948 2010-02-11 06:40:56 +0000 text/richtext is obsolete; it is inappropriate as an example 2010-10-04 14:29:23 +0000 1 1 1 Unclassified HTML WG pre-LC1 HTML5 spec (editor: Ian Hickson) unspecified Other other RESOLVED FIXED http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/#custom-handlers P3 normal LC 1 contributor ian ian mike public-html-admin public-html-wg-issue-tracking public-html-bugzilla oldest_to_newest 31744 0 contributor 2010-02-11 06:40:56 +0000 Section: http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/#custom-handlers Comment: text/richtext is obsolete; it is inappropriate as an example Posted from: 220.210.139.122 32246 1 ian 2010-02-17 10:09:39 +0000 EDITOR'S RESPONSE: This is an Editor's Response to your comment. If you are satisfied with this response, please change the state of this bug to CLOSED. If you have additional information and would like the editor to reconsider, please reopen this bug. If you would like to escalate the issue to the full HTML Working Group, please add the TrackerRequest keyword to this bug, and suggest title and text for the tracker issue; or you may create a tracker issue yourself, if you are able to do so. For more details, see this document: http://dev.w3.org/html5/decision-policy/decision-policy.html Status: Accepted Change Description: changed types to vnd types Rationale: I don't mind what types we use here. Maybe vendor types are actually better examples. BTW, it's not obsolete according to IANA. 32247 2 contributor 2010-02-17 10:10:06 +0000 Checked in as WHATWG revision r4759. Check-in comment: Switch to using some vnd.x MIME types, since apparently I picked some bad types last time. http://html5.org/tools/web-apps-tracker?from=4758&to=4759