8855 2010-02-01 16:26:59 +0000 tel URI reference 2010-10-04 14:45:22 +0000 1 1 1 Unclassified HTML WG pre-LC1 HTML5 spec (editor: Ian Hickson) unspecified PC Windows NT RESOLVED FIXED P2 normal --- 1 julian.reschke ian ian mike public-html-admin public-html-wg-issue-tracking public-html-bugzilla oldest_to_newest 31384 0 julian.reschke 2010-02-01 16:26:59 +0000 RFC 2806 has been obsoleted by RFC 3966, which in particular classifies "fax" as historic. So unless this is a real world example I'd recommend to use either a "tel" URI, or choose a different example. 31987 1 ian 2010-02-14 06:58:26 +0000 EDITOR'S RESPONSE: This is an Editor's Response to your comment. If you are satisfied with this response, please change the state of this bug to CLOSED. If you have additional information and would like the editor to reconsider, please reopen this bug. If you would like to escalate the issue to the full HTML Working Group, please add the TrackerRequest keyword to this bug, and suggest title and text for the tracker issue; or you may create a tracker issue yourself, if you are able to do so. For more details, see this document: http://dev.w3.org/html5/decision-policy/decision-policy.html Status: Did Not Understand Request Change Description: no spec change Rationale: I don't this tel: would make a very good example (what would it mean for a Web site to register the tel: scheme?) but if you have any other suggestions, I'm very happy to change away from fax:. In practice, I think most examples are going to be people inventing new schemes and registering those, but I don't want to use that as an example since people might think it's ok to just make up schemes instead of registering them with IANA first. 32047 2 julian.reschke 2010-02-14 10:34:05 +0000 If the best example you have is "fax" then maybe this feature isn't needed. On the other hand, wasn't "mailto" (-> gemail & friend) the main use case for this? 32344 3 ian 2010-02-18 05:01:32 +0000 EDITOR'S RESPONSE: This is an Editor's Response to your comment. If you are satisfied with this response, please change the state of this bug to CLOSED. If you have additional information and would like the editor to reconsider, please reopen this bug. If you would like to escalate the issue to the full HTML Working Group, please add the TrackerRequest keyword to this bug, and suggest title and text for the tracker issue; or you may create a tracker issue yourself, if you are able to do so. For more details, see this document: http://dev.w3.org/html5/decision-policy/decision-policy.html Status: Partially Accepted Change Description: see diff given below Rationale: After looking at the registry for inspiration, I changed it to use the sms: scheme. 32345 4 contributor 2010-02-18 05:02:16 +0000 Checked in as WHATWG revision r4777. Check-in comment: fax: is apparently no longer in season. http://html5.org/tools/web-apps-tracker?from=4776&to=4777