8781 2010-01-19 02:53:31 +0000 'being closed' -> 'was closed' 2010-10-04 14:31:28 +0000 1 1 1 Unclassified HTML WG pre-LC1 HTML5 spec (editor: Ian Hickson) unspecified Other other RESOLVED WONTFIX http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/#history-1 P3 normal LC 1 contributor ian ian mike public-html-admin public-html-wg-issue-tracking public-html-bugzilla oldest_to_newest 31111 0 contributor 2010-01-19 02:53:31 +0000 Section: http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/#history-1 Comment: 'was closed' Posted from: 69.203.207.31 31897 1 ian 2010-02-13 10:58:26 +0000 EDITOR'S RESPONSE: This is an Editor's Response to your comment. If you are satisfied with this response, please change the state of this bug to CLOSED. If you have additional information and would like the editor to reconsider, please reopen this bug. If you would like to escalate the issue to the full HTML Working Group, please add the TrackerRequest keyword to this bug, and suggest title and text for the tracker issue; or you may create a tracker issue yourself, if you are able to do so. For more details, see this document: http://dev.w3.org/html5/decision-policy/decision-policy.html Status: Rejected Change Description: no spec change Rationale: "being" is grammatically correct here. It might not win any awards for crystal clear English writing, but it's correct.