8730 2010-01-13 07:15:20 +0000 Buffering should not be a boolean "autobuffer" tag - but something along the lines of "buffermax= n%" There should also be a "no-cache" attribute - this will overcome expected objections from copyright holders 2010-10-04 13:55:47 +0000 1 1 1 Unclassified HTML WG pre-LC1 HTML5 spec (editor: Ian Hickson) unspecified Other other RESOLVED WONTFIX http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/#video P3 normal LC 1 contributor ian ian mike public-html-admin public-html-wg-issue-tracking public-html-bugzilla oldest_to_newest 31002 0 contributor 2010-01-13 07:15:20 +0000 Section: http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/#video Comment: Buffering should not be a boolean "autobuffer" tag - but something along the lines of "buffermax= n%" There should also be a "no-cache" attribute - this will overcome expected objections from copyright holders Posted from: 81.82.208.61 31858 1 ian 2010-02-12 12:50:38 +0000 Since there's more discussion there, I'll deal with the first part of that (controlling what is buffered) as part of bug 8731. 31859 2 ian 2010-02-12 12:51:45 +0000 EDITOR'S RESPONSE: This is an Editor's Response to your comment. If you are satisfied with this response, please change the state of this bug to CLOSED. If you have additional information and would like the editor to reconsider, please reopen this bug. If you would like to escalate the issue to the full HTML Working Group, please add the TrackerRequest keyword to this bug, and suggest title and text for the tracker issue; or you may create a tracker issue yourself, if you are able to do so. For more details, see this document: http://dev.w3.org/html5/decision-policy/decision-policy.html Status: Rejected Change Description: no spec change Rationale: Regarding the second part, you can already specify the caching behaviour using HTTP Cache-Control headers, so it doesn't seem that there's anything needed in HTML itself.