8710 2010-01-11 15:03:43 +0000 option . text: c/p'd too much; also add a line in the IDL [ms] 2010-10-04 14:46:21 +0000 1 1 1 Unclassified HTML WG pre-LC1 HTML5 spec (editor: Ian Hickson) unspecified Other other CLOSED WONTFIX http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/#the-a-element P3 normal LC 1 contributor ian ian mike Ms2ger public-html-admin public-html-wg-issue-tracking public-html-bugzilla oldest_to_newest 30923 0 contributor 2010-01-11 15:03:43 +0000 Section: http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/#the-a-element Comment: option . text: c/p'd too much; also add a line in the IDL [ms] Posted from: 91.180.142.166 30927 1 Ms2ger 2010-01-11 15:45:36 +0000 And HTMLAnchorElement.text is readonly. 31577 2 ian 2010-02-06 02:28:12 +0000 EDITOR'S RESPONSE: This is an Editor's Response to your comment. If you are satisfied with this response, please change the state of this bug to CLOSED. If you have additional information and would like the editor to reconsider, please reopen this bug. If you would like to escalate the issue to the full HTML Working Group, please add the TrackerRequest keyword to this bug, and suggest title and text for the tracker issue; or you may create a tracker issue yourself, if you are able to do so. For more details, see this document: http://dev.w3.org/html5/decision-policy/decision-policy.html Status: Partially Accepted Change Description: see diff given below Rationale: I fixed the copy/paste issues, and added it to the IDL, but I made it read/write to make implementing it easier (as an alias to textContent). 31578 3 contributor 2010-02-06 02:28:33 +0000 Checked in as WHATWG revision r4679. Check-in comment: Correct the xrefs and update the IDL. http://html5.org/tools/web-apps-tracker?from=4678&to=4679 31601 4 Ms2ger 2010-02-06 14:42:29 +0000 2 out of 3 implementations (Gecko and WebKit) implement it as readonly, so I think changing that isn't going to make implementing easier, rather to the contrary. 32044 5 ian 2010-02-14 10:27:42 +0000 EDITOR'S RESPONSE: This is an Editor's Response to your comment. If you are satisfied with this response, please change the state of this bug to CLOSED. If you have additional information and would like the editor to reconsider, please reopen this bug. If you would like to escalate the issue to the full HTML Working Group, please add the TrackerRequest keyword to this bug, and suggest title and text for the tracker issue; or you may create a tracker issue yourself, if you are able to do so. For more details, see this document: http://dev.w3.org/html5/decision-policy/decision-policy.html Status: Rejected Change Description: no spec change Rationale: If those two implementations are a majority of the implementations of HTML for the lifetime of HTML, then we'll have failed dramatically. The whole point of defining HTML to this level of detail is to encourage competition by making it easier to write new Web browsers.