8616 2010-01-04 09:53:34 +0000 Schema simpleContent.xsd is invalid 2010-02-17 20:14:21 +0000 1 1 1 Unclassified XML Query Test Suite XML Query Test Suite unspecified PC Windows NT RESOLVED FIXED P2 normal --- 1 mike holstege public-qt-comments oldest_to_newest 30365 0 mike 2010-01-04 09:53:34 +0000 I believe the schema simpleContent.xsd is invalid. (It was introduced to support new tests testing the resolution of bug #4413, that is validateexpr-sc-1 et seq, I believe by Mary Holstege.) Line 28 has <xs:complexType name="complexExtendsEmptyMixed"> <xs:annotation> <xs:documentation> A complex type that extends a mixed content base with no content model. </xs:documentation> </xs:annotation> <xs:simpleContent> <xs:extension base="ss:emptyMixed"/> </xs:simpleContent> </xs:complexType> where ss:emptyMixed is <xs:complexType name="emptyMixed" mixed="true"> <xs:annotation> <xs:documentation> A complex type that is mixed but with no content model. </xs:documentation> </xs:annotation> <xs:sequence/> </xs:complexType> Under XSD 1.0, emptyMixed results in a complexType schema component with {contentType} = (mixed, a particle with (minOccurs=1, maxOccurs=1, term=(compositor=sequence, particles=empty))). The complexType component derived from complexExtendsEmptyMixed does not satisfy Schema Component Constraint: Derivation Valid (Extension), because none of the conditions in clause 1.4 is true: 1.4.1 is false because the {content type} of the {base type definition} is not a simple type definition 1.4.2 is false because the {content type} of the {base type definition} is not empty (it is a particle whose term is an empty sequence, which is not the same thing) 1.4.3 is false because 1.4.3.1 is false: the {content type} of the complex type definition itself [complexExtendsEmptyMixed] does not specify a particle 31671 1 holstege 2010-02-09 17:03:07 +0000 Looks right to me. I'll fix the test. 32280 2 holstege 2010-02-17 20:14:21 +0000 Fixed 2010-02-17. Removed bogus extension and test that depends on it.