8591 2010-01-03 18:59:18 +0000 list document.html under DOM tree accessors? 2010-10-04 14:56:54 +0000 1 1 1 Unclassified HTML WG pre-LC1 HTML5 spec (editor: Ian Hickson) unspecified PC Windows NT RESOLVED WONTFIX http://dev.w3.org/html5/spec/Overview.html#creating-and-inserting-elements P2 normal --- 1 brutzman ian annevk brutzman ian mike public-html-admin public-html-wg-issue-tracking public-html-bugzilla oldest_to_newest 30323 0 brutzman 2010-01-03 18:59:18 +0000 3.1.4 DOM tree accessors Should there be an inset box for document . html similar to document . head etc. 30455 1 annevk 2010-01-05 07:17:35 +0000 I don't think this is needed. We already have document.documentElement. 31495 2 ian 2010-02-05 20:13:15 +0000 EDITOR'S RESPONSE: This is an Editor's Response to your comment. If you are satisfied with this response, please change the state of this bug to CLOSED. If you have additional information and would like the editor to reconsider, please reopen this bug. If you would like to escalate the issue to the full HTML Working Group, please add the TrackerRequest keyword to this bug, and suggest title and text for the tracker issue; or you may create a tracker issue yourself, if you are able to do so. For more details, see this document: http://dev.w3.org/html5/decision-policy/decision-policy.html Status: Rejected Change Description: no spec change Rationale: document.html isn't necessary, since document.documentElement already returns that. We might want to do document.head one day, but the use cases for it aren't so compelling that we should add it now. Best to wait until the implementations of the new APIs have caught up with the spec. (There's no inset box because the APIs in question currently don't exist.) 31503 3 ian 2010-02-05 20:32:18 +0000 Er, disregard what I said about document.head. I'd forgotten that we'd already added that. The rest holds.