8589 2010-01-03 18:54:45 +0000 invalid value default needs markup as definition 2010-10-04 14:29:42 +0000 1 1 1 Unclassified HTML WG pre-LC1 HTML5 spec (editor: Ian Hickson) unspecified PC Windows NT CLOSED WONTFIX http://dev.w3.org/html5/spec/Overview.html#keywords-and-enumerated-attributes P2 normal --- 1 brutzman ian brutzman ian mike public-html-admin public-html-wg-issue-tracking public-html-bugzilla oldest_to_newest 30321 0 brutzman 2010-01-03 18:54:45 +0000 2.4.3 Keywords and enumerated attributes states "In addition, two default states can be given. The first is the <i>invalid value default</i>, the second is the <i>missing value default</i>." The two italicized terms are not tagged as defined. 30894 1 ian 2010-01-11 10:42:26 +0000 EDITOR'S RESPONSE: This is an Editor's Response to your comment. If you are satisfied with this response, please change the state of this bug to CLOSED. If you have additional information and would like the editor to reconsider, please reopen this bug. If you would like to escalate the issue to the full HTML Working Group, please add the TrackerRequest keyword to this bug, and suggest title and text for the tracker issue; or you may create a tracker issue yourself, if you are able to do so. For more details, see this document: http://dev.w3.org/html5/decision-policy/decision-policy.html Status: Rejected Change Description: no spec change Rationale: Indeed, they're not really defined, they're just names. I was worried that hyperlinking them all over the place would lead to just even more links that are confusing, without actually helping anyone reading the spec. Do you think I'm wrong about this? I could add the links if you think that would be helpful, though even then they wouldn't really be definitions per se. 31211 2 brutzman 2010-01-26 07:04:59 +0000 i agree that you don't want to identify terms as linkable definitions if they aren't used elsewhere as such.