8513 2009-12-17 12:40:36 +0000 AFAICT from WebIDL, ports can never be null, so step 3 is a no-op. If the sequence should be nullable, it has to be written with a question mark in the IDL, I think. [sp] 2010-10-04 14:31:29 +0000 1 1 1 Unclassified HTML WG pre-LC1 HTML5 spec (editor: Ian Hickson) unspecified Other other CLOSED FIXED http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/#posting-messages-with-message-ports P3 normal LC 1 contributor ian ian mike public-html-admin public-html-wg-issue-tracking public-html-bugzilla oldest_to_newest 30190 0 contributor 2009-12-17 12:40:36 +0000 Section: http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/#posting-messages-with-message-ports Comment: AFAICT from WebIDL, ports can never be null, so step 3 is a no-op. If the sequence should be nullable, it has to be written with a question mark in the IDL, I think. [sp] Posted from: 88.131.66.80 30651 1 ian 2010-01-06 11:44:46 +0000 EDITOR'S RESPONSE: This is an Editor's Response to your comment. If you are satisfied with this response, please change the state of this bug to CLOSED. If you have additional information and would like the editor to reconsider, please reopen this bug. If you would like to escalate the issue to the full HTML Working Group, please add the TrackerRequest keyword to this bug, and suggest title and text for the tracker issue; or you may create a tracker issue yourself, if you are able to do so. For more details, see this document: http://dev.w3.org/html5/decision-policy/decision-policy.html Status: Accepted Change Description: see diff given below Rationale: Concurred with reporter's comments. 30652 2 contributor 2010-01-06 11:45:48 +0000 Checked in as WHATWG revision r4524. Check-in comment: Change the algorithm to avoid step 3 being a no-op. This will all become moot when I merge the -2 and -3 variants of this algorithm together. http://html5.org/tools/web-apps-tracker?from=4523&to=4524