8496 2009-12-15 14:03:44 +0000 Shouldn't a loop in structured clone throw INVALID_STATE_ERR instead? [sp] 2010-10-04 13:55:48 +0000 1 1 1 Unclassified HTML WG pre-LC1 HTML5 spec (editor: Ian Hickson) unspecified Other other CLOSED WONTFIX http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/#safe-passing-of-structured-data P3 normal LC 1 contributor ian ian mike public-html-admin public-html-wg-issue-tracking public-html-bugzilla oldest_to_newest 30138 0 contributor 2009-12-15 14:03:44 +0000 Section: http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/#safe-passing-of-structured-data Comment: Shouldn't a loop in structured clone throw INVALID_STATE_ERR instead? [sp] Posted from: 88.131.66.80 30604 1 ian 2010-01-06 08:03:36 +0000 EDITOR'S RESPONSE: This is an Editor's Response to your comment. If you are satisfied with this response, please change the state of this bug to CLOSED. If you have additional information and would like the editor to reconsider, please reopen this bug. If you would like to escalate the issue to the full HTML Working Group, please add the TrackerRequest keyword to this bug, and suggest title and text for the tracker issue; or you may create a tracker issue yourself, if you are able to do so. For more details, see this document: http://dev.w3.org/html5/decision-policy/decision-policy.html Status: Rejected Change Description: no spec change Rationale: Why would INVALID_STATE_ERR be appropriate? The object isn't in an invalid state, it's the argument that's in an invalid state. Anyway, I picked NOT_SUPPORTED_ERR because I figured one day we might support it.