8474 2009-12-11 01:02:29 +0000 declaration for 'restriction' in XMLSchema.dtd needs update 2011-01-24 01:21:54 +0000 1 1 1 Unclassified XML Schema Datatypes: XSD Part 2 1.1 only Macintosh Mac System 9.x RESOLVED FIXED resolved P2 normal --- 1 cmsmcq David_E3 cmsmcq www-xml-schema-comments oldest_to_newest 30072 0 cmsmcq 2009-12-11 01:02:29 +0000 In XMLSchema.dtd, the declaration for restriction must allow both the content allowed by restriction in a complex type and the content allowed by restriction in a simple type. The DTD version needs to be updated to reflect the addition of the 'openContent' element. Other declarations may also need update; I haven't looked. This was raised some time ago on xmlschema-dev but we appear not to have opened an issue for it, and we appear not to have fixed the problem. (If we did fix it, or we have figured out that there is no problem, and I've overlooked the fact, this issue can be closed without further work.) The relevant schemadev thread is the one including the message http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/xmlschema-dev/2009Jul/0014.html from Roger Costello. 42805 1 cmsmcq 2010-11-27 00:43:14 +0000 The required change is in the Structures spec: change <!-- This is used in part2 --> <!ENTITY % restriction1 '((%mgs; | %group;)?)'> to <!-- This is used in part2 --> <!ENTITY % restriction1 '(%openContent;, (%mgs; | %group;)?)'> 44640 2 cmsmcq 2011-01-24 01:21:54 +0000 The change mentioned in comment 1 has now been integrated into the member-only status-quo documents at http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/2004/06/xmlschema-1/structures.html http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/2004/06/xmlschema-1/structures.diff-wd.html http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/2004/06/xmlschema-1/structures.diff-1.0.html (There was some confusion or complication; it was supposed to have been integrated some time ago, but hadn't been. I've now done it, and checked it.) So I'm marking this as resolved.