8394 2009-11-28 20:23:06 +0000 does not report this:<a ..>></a> as problem 2009-11-29 21:21:44 +0000 1 1 1 Unclassified Validator Parser HEAD PC Windows XP RESOLVED INVALID P2 trivial --- 1 cvenkel.miran dave.null www-validator-cvs oldest_to_newest 29775 0 cvenkel.miran 2009-11-28 20:23:06 +0000 <!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Transitional//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-transitional.dtd"> 1.This is ok markup: <a ..><</a> <a ..>></a> 2. This is not ok markup: <a ..><</a> <a ..>></a> But valdator warns only about firt one from (2). Regards 29784 1 ville.skytta 2009-11-29 21:21:44 +0000 (In reply to comment #0) > 2. This is not ok markup: > <a ..><</a> > <a ..>></a> > > But valdator warns only about firt one from (2). Validator is correct - the first one is not ok, but escaping ">" as ">" in XML while a good general practice is not a must except in certain circumstances. See http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-xml/#syntax http://annevankesteren.nl/2005/09/gt