8185 2009-11-04 18:52:57 +0000 Frag: fragment Put @Mode="Insert" underspecified 2010-03-17 11:17:42 +0000 1 1 1 Unclassified WS-Resource Access Fragment LC All All CLOSED REMIND P2 normal --- 1 gilbert.pilz gilbert.pilz dug public-ws-resource-access-notifications oldest_to_newest 29314 0 gilbert.pilz 2009-11-04 18:52:57 +0000 The description of /wst:Put/wsf:Fragment/wsf:Expression@Mode="http://www.w3.org/2009/09/ws-fra/Modes/Insert" reads as follows: "When the Mode attribute is set to a value of "http://www.w3.org/2009/09/ws-fra/Modes/Insert" the resource representation specified within the Value element MUST be added to the resource representation. If the expression targets a repeated element (maxOccurs > 1), the fragment MUST be added at the end. If the expression targets a non-repeated element (maxOccurrs = 1) that already exists, the resource MUST generate a wst:InvalidRepresentation fault. If the expression targets an existing item of a repeated element, the fragment MUST be added before the existing item." The above text seems to assume that Value will always target an element, however it is possible for Value to target an attribute or set of attributes, etc. It seems that not all @Modes make sense for all target Values. Strawman Proposal: In each language section (Sections 5, 6, and 7) clearly identify which targets support which @Modes. 32784 1 dug 2010-03-03 02:29:51 +0000 Resolve on 3/2/2010 with proposal in: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-resource-access/2010Feb/0022.html with the following modifications: - Keep a "Remove" mode - "Replace" mode MUST have a Value element - to "Replace" add something like: If the expression is invalid per the xsd, assuming xsd checking, then it MUST generate an invalidExpression fault - Rename "Insert" to "Add"