8143 2009-11-01 12:11:57 +0000 [gsnedders] Need to add EOF here, as <xmp>foo</xmp behaviour changed when removing content model flags (also to similar RCDATA state). 2010-10-04 14:46:31 +0000 1 1 1 Unclassified HTML WG pre-LC1 HTML5 spec (editor: Ian Hickson) unspecified Other other RESOLVED WONTFIX http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/#rawtext-end-tag-name-state NE P3 critical LC 1 contributor ian geoffers+w3cbugs ian mike public-html-admin public-html-wg-issue-tracking public-html-bugzilla oldest_to_newest 29245 0 contributor 2009-11-01 12:11:57 +0000 Section: http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/#rawtext-end-tag-name-state Comment: [gsnedders] Need to add EOF here, as <xmp>foo</xmp behaviour changed when removing content model flags (also to similar RCDATA state). Posted from: 83.252.233.86 29266 1 geoffers+w3cbugs 2009-11-03 17:59:52 +0000 <gsnedders> Basically, you read rawtext/rcdata end tag name state, and eventually you have in temporary buffer "xmp", and then you hit EOF. When you hit EOF, we should have a case in that state in the parser which just reprocesses the EOF character in the data state <gsnedders> I guess we should change script data too [for consistency] 29268 2 ian 2009-11-03 19:49:10 +0000 EDITOR'S RESPONSE: This is an Editor's Response to your comment. If you are satisfied with this response, please change the state of this bug to CLOSED. If you have additional information and would like the editor to reconsider, please reopen this bug. If you would like to escalate the issue to the full HTML Working Group, please add the TrackerRequest keyword to this bug, and suggest title and text for the tracker issue; or you may create a tracker issue yourself, if you are able to do so. For more details, see this document: http://dev.w3.org/html5/decision-policy/decision-policy.html Status: Rejected Change Description: no spec change Rationale: The new behaviour makes more sense, no? Let me know if you find what the original reason for this behaviour was. I wasn't able to find why we changed this in my very brief search.