8124 2009-10-29 15:32:39 +0000 All: policy URIs - what do they reference? 2015-06-20 16:34:57 +0000 1 1 1 Unclassified WS-Resource Access All FPWD All All CLOSED REMIND P2 normal --- 1 dug public-ws-resource-access-notifications public-ws-resource-access-notifications oldest_to_newest 29199 0 dug 2009-10-29 15:32:39 +0000 For each spec (except MEX) we've defined policy URIs -for example, in WS-Transfer we now have the XML prefix "wstrp" mapping to: http://www.w3.org/2009/09/ws-trp The WG needs to decide a couple of things: 1 - do we want to have a separate NS for the policy assertions or should we just reuse the normal NS for each spec 2 - if we do have separate namespaces then what do those URIs point to? For example, does http://.../2009/09/ws-trp reference the Transfer spec? What do we put in the Namespace table? Right now for "wstrp" it says "This specification". Which, if remains, why do we have a separate NS? If we see the policy assertions having a separate lifecycle from the specs then a separate NS makes sense. But if they will pretty much always be tied to the spec then a separate NS seems pointless. No proposal at this time - but we should discuss. 29403 1 bob 2009-11-06 18:48:25 +0000 Resolved, eliminate the policy namespaces and use the policy of the specification 121262 2 jackiewindsor09 2015-06-20 16:34:07 +0000 Please make my changes 121342 3 jackiewindsor09 2015-06-20 16:34:57 +0000 Please make my changes