7975 2009-10-20 10:22:36 +0000 [XQTS] Test results with namespace URIs that are not URIs cannot be canonicalized. 2011-08-30 00:32:55 +0000 1 1 1 Unclassified XML Query Test Suite XML Query Test Suite unspecified PC Windows NT RESOLVED DUPLICATE 6868 P2 normal --- 1 oliver frans.englich jmdyck mike spungi public-qt-comments oldest_to_newest 28563 0 oliver 2009-10-20 10:22:36 +0000 The following tests contain namespace URIs that are not valid URIs in their results. K2-DirectConElemNamespace-59 K2-DirectConElemNamespace-60 K2-DirectConElemNamespace-75 K2-DirectConElemNamespace-76 K2-DirectConElemNamespace-78 K2-DirectConElemNamespace-82 K2-DirectConElemNamespace-83 K2-DirectConElemNamespace-84 K2-DirectConElemNamespace-85 K2-CopyNamespacesProlog-1 In order to compare the results of these tests, the expected result documents should be canonicalized. Unfortunately canonicalization is defined to raise an error in this case (where a namespace URI is not a valid absolute URI). 28570 1 oliver 2009-10-20 10:45:56 +0000 Two more tests with the same problem: K2-DirectConElem-47 K2-NamespaceProlog-13 33568 2 frans.englich 2010-03-15 09:34:55 +0000 This report at least partly duplicates bug #6868. The problem is that these tests test valid syntax & semantics, which needs to be done. That it then fails in c18n, is a separate problem. 33570 3 mike 2010-03-15 10:00:42 +0000 >The problem is that these tests test valid syntax & semantics, which needs to be done. See comment #12 of bug #6868. I think our purpose is to test interoperability, and the state of the XML specs, taken as a whole, is such that there is no expectation of interoperability when invalid or relative URIs are used as namespace names. So we shouldn't use them in the public test suite. Of course products will have their own rules on how such cases are handled, and will therefore need such tests in their private test suites, but that's a different matter. 33592 4 frans.englich 2010-03-15 13:54:20 +0000 *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 6868 *** 41105 5 spungi 2010-10-12 14:15:24 +0000 I have added XQST0022 as an alternate result for tests: K2-DirectConElem-47 K2-DirectConElemNamespace-59 K2-DirectConElemNamespace-65 K2-DirectConElemNamespace-75 K2-DirectConElemNamespace-76 because, as it was also mentioned by a comment for these tests, some processors MAY report the URI's as invalid. 56018 6 jmdyck 2011-08-30 00:32:55 +0000 Re the previous comment, see Bug 13966.