<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes" ?>
<!DOCTYPE bugzilla SYSTEM "https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/page.cgi?id=bugzilla.dtd">

<bugzilla version="5.0.4"
          urlbase="https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/"
          
          maintainer="sysbot+bugzilla@w3.org"
>

    <bug>
          <bug_id>7919</bug_id>
          
          <creation_ts>2009-10-14 15:48:52 +0000</creation_ts>
          <short_desc>[XQTS] CVS: ModuleImport.xml doesn&apos;t validate against schema</short_desc>
          <delta_ts>2009-10-16 14:34:54 +0000</delta_ts>
          <reporter_accessible>1</reporter_accessible>
          <cclist_accessible>1</cclist_accessible>
          <classification_id>1</classification_id>
          <classification>Unclassified</classification>
          <product>XML Query Test Suite</product>
          <component>XML Query Test Suite</component>
          <version>unspecified</version>
          <rep_platform>PC</rep_platform>
          <op_sys>Windows NT</op_sys>
          <bug_status>CLOSED</bug_status>
          <resolution>FIXED</resolution>
          
          
          <bug_file_loc></bug_file_loc>
          <status_whiteboard></status_whiteboard>
          <keywords></keywords>
          <priority>P2</priority>
          <bug_severity>normal</bug_severity>
          <target_milestone>---</target_milestone>
          
          
          <everconfirmed>1</everconfirmed>
          <reporter name="Tim Mills">tim</reporter>
          <assigned_to name="John Snelson">john.snelson</assigned_to>
          <cc>mike</cc>
          
          <qa_contact name="Mailing list for public feedback on specs from XSL and XML Query WGs">public-qt-comments</qa_contact>

      

      

      

          <comment_sort_order>oldest_to_newest</comment_sort_order>  
          <long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>28349</commentid>
    <comment_count>0</comment_count>
    <who name="Tim Mills">tim</who>
    <bug_when>2009-10-14 15:48:52 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>See errata6-001 in ModuleImport.xml for an example.

reflects-resolution should appear after spec-citation</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>28380</commentid>
    <comment_count>1</comment_count>
    <who name="John Snelson">john.snelson</who>
    <bug_when>2009-10-15 21:00:38 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>I accept the responsibility for this bug, and have fixed it.

However, I respectfully point out that specifying a specific element order in the schema like that does not make for a very user friendly content model.</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>28384</commentid>
    <comment_count>2</comment_count>
    <who name="Michael Kay">mike</who>
    <bug_when>2009-10-15 21:23:47 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>&gt;a specific element order in the schema like that does not make for a very user friendly content model.

It&apos;s often claimed that a fixed order makes things harder for writers but easier for readers, and that document design should be optimized for readers.

</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>28385</commentid>
    <comment_count>3</comment_count>
    <who name="John Snelson">john.snelson</who>
    <bug_when>2009-10-15 22:09:44 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>I suppose that depends who your reader is. If the reader is XQuery or my SAX based XQTS test runner, an undefined order makes little difference. If the reader is human, then I&apos;d argue that a narrative order is best - which is very different to a fixed order.</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>28395</commentid>
    <comment_count>4</comment_count>
    <who name="Tim Mills">tim</who>
    <bug_when>2009-10-16 14:34:54 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>Thanks.</thetext>
  </long_desc>
      
      

    </bug>

</bugzilla>