786 2004-06-04 13:12:54 +0000 Canonicalize input URI References 2004-11-13 15:55:48 +0000 1 1 1 Unclassified Validator check 0.7.0 Other other RESOLVED FIXED P2 minor 0.7.0 1 bjoern link www-validator-cvs oldest_to_newest 2001 0 bjoern 2004-06-04 13:12:54 +0000 Depending on whether the input URI is http://www.google.com or http://www.google.com/ one gets different graphs in the Notation3 output, namely earl:testSubject <http://www.google.com> versus earl:testSubject <http://www.google.com/> which is rather undesirable. URI->canonicalize(...) would prevent that. 2186 1 link 2004-09-01 10:32:19 +0000 Uhm. AFAIK, the two URLs are entirely equivalent. Why would this be a problem (in n3 or otherwise)? Canonic URLs is probably a good idea on general principle, but you seem to be implying a specific bug here? 2254 2 bjoern 2004-09-06 21:22:29 +0000 They are not equivalent when compared as strings which is how things work in RDF, as I wrote, you have two different graphs which is undesirable. This does not violate some protocol, but should be fixed nonetheless. 2611 3 ville.skytta 2004-11-13 15:55:48 +0000 Fixed in HEAD.