<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes" ?>
<!DOCTYPE bugzilla SYSTEM "https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/page.cgi?id=bugzilla.dtd">

<bugzilla version="5.0.4"
          urlbase="https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/"
          
          maintainer="sysbot+bugzilla@w3.org"
>

    <bug>
          <bug_id>7570</bug_id>
          
          <creation_ts>2009-09-10 22:31:53 +0000</creation_ts>
          <short_desc>what image formats must be supported?</short_desc>
          <delta_ts>2010-02-17 07:09:28 +0000</delta_ts>
          <reporter_accessible>1</reporter_accessible>
          <cclist_accessible>1</cclist_accessible>
          <classification_id>1</classification_id>
          <classification>Unclassified</classification>
          <product>XSLFO</product>
          <component>XSL-FO</component>
          <version>2.0 Working Draft</version>
          <rep_platform>PC</rep_platform>
          <op_sys>Linux</op_sys>
          <bug_status>NEW</bug_status>
          <resolution></resolution>
          
          
          <bug_file_loc></bug_file_loc>
          <status_whiteboard></status_whiteboard>
          <keywords></keywords>
          <priority>P2</priority>
          <bug_severity>normal</bug_severity>
          <target_milestone>---</target_milestone>
          
          
          <everconfirmed>1</everconfirmed>
          <reporter name="Liam R E Quin">liam</reporter>
          <assigned_to name="Liam R E Quin">liam</assigned_to>
          <cc>klaas.bals</cc>
          
          <qa_contact name="Mailing list for comments on XSL (XSl-FO)">xsl-editors</qa_contact>

      

      

      

          <comment_sort_order>oldest_to_newest</comment_sort_order>  
          <long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>27028</commentid>
    <comment_count>0</comment_count>
    <who name="Liam R E Quin">liam</who>
    <bug_when>2009-09-10 22:31:53 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>Should there be a list of image formats that &quot;MUST&quot; be supported, e.g. PNG?

What about formatters or devices that can&apos;t do images at all?</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>27029</commentid>
    <comment_count>1</comment_count>
    <who name="Liam R E Quin">liam</who>
    <bug_when>2009-09-10 22:32:18 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>[taken from &quot;Design Considerations&quot; draft]</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>32230</commentid>
    <comment_count>2</comment_count>
    <who name="Klaas Bals">klaas.bals</who>
    <bug_when>2010-02-17 07:09:28 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>I&apos;m not sure this is a good idea. We don&apos;t put any constraints on the output format either, e.g. we don&apos;t say you mus support PDF or PNG as output format, nor do we specifiy anything about required fonts etc. So if we add PNG as required image, we&apos;d risk getting into the other formats too. However if other people feel we need this because of real problems, I&apos;m not opposed to this. (FYI Scriptura does supports PNG as image format).</thetext>
  </long_desc>
      
      

    </bug>

</bugzilla>