7540 2009-09-07 21:00:00 +0000 Spec for metadata extensions does not define which states are allowed/conforming 2010-10-04 14:49:00 +0000 1 1 1 Unclassified HTML WG pre-LC1 HTML5 spec (editor: Ian Hickson) unspecified All All CLOSED FIXED NE P2 normal --- 1 mjs ian julian.reschke mike public-html-admin public-html-wg-issue-tracking public-html-bugzilla oldest_to_newest 26925 0 mjs 2009-09-07 21:00:00 +0000 The spec for meta extensions (currently section 4.2.5.2) defines three statuses for extensions (Proposal, Accepted, and Unendorsed) and says that conformance checkers must check the wiki to determine whether a meta name value is allowed. However, it does not say which of these three statuses count as allowed - is it only the Accepted status, Accepted and Proposal status, or all three statuses that count as allowed for validators (and therefore presumably conforming)? The wiki page does not make this clear either. The spec should be explicit about this. 27318 1 ian 2009-09-18 21:31:00 +0000 Fixed the spec. I haven't updated the wiki pages, but anyone who feels like doing that should feel entitled to go ahead and clean them up accordingly. 33408 2 mjs 2010-03-14 14:50:49 +0000 This bug predates the HTML Working Group Decision Policy. If you are satisfied with the resolution of this bug, please change the state of this bug to CLOSED. If you have additional information and would like the editor to reconsider, please reopen this bug. If you would like to escalate the issue to the full HTML Working Group, please add the TrackerRequest keyword to this bug, and suggest title and text for the tracker issue; or you may create a tracker issue yourself, if you are able to do so. For more details, see this document: http://dev.w3.org/html5/decision-policy/decision-policy.html This bug is now being moved to VERIFIED. Please respond within two weeks. If this bug is not closed, reopened or escalated within two weeks, it may be marked as NoReply and will no longer be considered a pending comment.