7539 2009-09-07 20:29:34 +0000 Since @summary is an official part of the table element, it is no longer obsolete. Suffienct warning language exists in it's definition that this entry should be removed 2011-04-13 00:06:35 +0000 1 1 1 Unclassified HTML WG pre-LC1 HTML5 spec (editor: Ian Hickson) unspecified All All RESOLVED FIXED http://whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/#warnings-for-obsolete-but-conforming-features a11y, a11ytf, a11y_table_summary, PFWG, WGDecision P3 normal LC 1 contributor ian ian julian.reschke laura.lee.carlson mike mjs public-html-a11y public-html-admin public-html-wg-issue-tracking rubys public-html-bugzilla oldest_to_newest 26924 0 contributor 2009-09-07 20:29:34 +0000 Section: http://whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/#warnings-for-obsolete-but-conforming-features Comment: Since @summary is an official part of the table element, it is no longer obsolete. Suffienct warning language exists in it's definition that this entry should be removed Posted from: 67.188.142.142 27502 1 ian 2009-09-22 10:26:19 +0000 It's not warning text (that would be class=warning, it's red if you have a visual UA), it's just a note reminding authors of another thing that generates a mandatory warning. 27551 2 shelleyp 2009-09-22 13:16:10 +0000 (In reply to comment #1) > It's not warning text (that would be class=warning, it's red if you have a > visual UA), it's just a note reminding authors of another thing that generates > a mandatory warning. > Telling authors that the use will issue a conformance warning _is_ a warning, regardless of text color. 27575 3 ian 2009-09-22 21:18:42 +0000 I believe that a reminder is appropriate here. If you disagree, please feel free to escalate this to the chairs. 27581 4 shelleyp 2009-09-22 21:26:17 +0000 (In reply to comment #3) > I believe that a reminder is appropriate here. If you disagree, please feel > free to escalate this to the chairs. > It has already been escalated to an Issue, and will continue to be LC blocking issue. Note, though, that this bug did not address whether the text was a "warning" or a "reminder" (and you need to consider people being color blind with your use of color). The bug focuses specifically on removing summary from the Conforming but obsolete section. 31459 5 cooper 2010-02-04 16:42:40 +0000 Removing myself from cc list, default on bug edits is to add, but I'm only acting on behalf of HTML A11Y TF which is already cc'd. 31762 6 cooper 2010-02-11 17:17:56 +0000 The HTML Accessibility Task Force intends to track these issues, per the proposal at http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html-a11y/2010Jan/0245.html. 33407 7 mjs 2010-03-14 14:50:48 +0000 This bug predates the HTML Working Group Decision Policy. If you are satisfied with the resolution of this bug, please change the state of this bug to CLOSED. If you have additional information and would like the editor to reconsider, please reopen this bug. If you would like to escalate the issue to the full HTML Working Group, please add the TrackerRequest keyword to this bug, and suggest title and text for the tracker issue; or you may create a tracker issue yourself, if you are able to do so. For more details, see this document: http://dev.w3.org/html5/decision-policy/decision-policy.html This bug is now being moved to VERIFIED. Please respond within two weeks. If this bug is not closed, reopened or escalated within two weeks, it may be marked as NoReply and will no longer be considered a pending comment. 33589 8 laura.lee.carlson 2010-03-15 12:33:16 +0000 Added TrackerIssue keyword as this is part of Tracker ISSUE-32 http://www.w3.org/html/wg/tracker/issues/32 33681 9 mike 2010-03-18 15:46:23 +0000 Reopened per discussion on a11y TF telcon 2010-03-18 33697 10 mjs 2010-03-18 17:21:10 +0000 This is tagged TrackerIssue. A big that has been escalated should not also be reopened. Back to VERIFIED. 47177 11 rubys 2011-04-06 00:49:47 +0000 Working Group Decision: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-html/2011Apr/0091.html 47386 12 contributor 2011-04-13 00:06:35 +0000 Checked in as WHATWG revision r5999. Check-in comment: apply wg decision http://html5.org/tools/web-apps-tracker?from=5998&to=5999