7379 2009-08-20 06:39:36 +0000 HTML5 should reference SVG1.1 as well as SVG1.2T 2010-10-04 14:48:57 +0000 1 1 1 Unclassified HTML WG pre-LC1 HTML5 spec (editor: Ian Hickson) unspecified All All CLOSED WONTFIX NE P2 normal --- 1 mjs ian mike public-html-admin public-html-wg-issue-tracking public-html-bugzilla oldest_to_newest 26551 0 mjs 2009-08-20 06:39:36 +0000 HTML5 has a reference to SVG 1.2T, but browsers are implementing most if not all of SVG 1.1, and the parsing spec is meant to cover it, so it seems an additional SVG 1.1 reference would be appropriate. 27267 1 ian 2009-09-17 22:31:48 +0000 The only reason I reference 1.2 Tiny specifically and not an unversioned URL is that the definition of how to process <svg:script> wasn't included in SVG until SVG Tiny 1.2, and the general unversioned /TR/SVG URL is still 1.1. If it wasn't for that, I wouldn't be referencing any version at all. HTML5 doesn't require any particular version of SVG, and I don't think coupling them together is a good idea, since it means that updating one implies updating the other (we had that problem with SVG and CSS2, if you recall). 33296 2 mjs 2010-03-14 14:49:48 +0000 This bug predates the HTML Working Group Decision Policy. If you are satisfied with the resolution of this bug, please change the state of this bug to CLOSED. If you have additional information and would like the editor to reconsider, please reopen this bug. If you would like to escalate the issue to the full HTML Working Group, please add the TrackerRequest keyword to this bug, and suggest title and text for the tracker issue; or you may create a tracker issue yourself, if you are able to do so. For more details, see this document: http://dev.w3.org/html5/decision-policy/decision-policy.html This bug is now being moved to VERIFIED. Please respond within two weeks. If this bug is not closed, reopened or escalated within two weeks, it may be marked as NoReply and will no longer be considered a pending comment.