<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes" ?>
<!DOCTYPE bugzilla SYSTEM "https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/page.cgi?id=bugzilla.dtd">

<bugzilla version="5.0.4"
          urlbase="https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/"
          
          maintainer="sysbot+bugzilla@w3.org"
>

    <bug>
          <bug_id>720</bug_id>
          
          <creation_ts>2004-05-15 06:23:29 +0000</creation_ts>
          <short_desc>Ugly fonts issues</short_desc>
          <delta_ts>2004-05-17 21:14:41 +0000</delta_ts>
          <reporter_accessible>1</reporter_accessible>
          <cclist_accessible>1</cclist_accessible>
          <classification_id>1</classification_id>
          <classification>Unclassified</classification>
          <product>Validator</product>
          <component>Website</component>
          <version>0.6.5</version>
          <rep_platform>Other</rep_platform>
          <op_sys>other</op_sys>
          <bug_status>RESOLVED</bug_status>
          <resolution>FIXED</resolution>
          
          
          <bug_file_loc></bug_file_loc>
          <status_whiteboard></status_whiteboard>
          <keywords></keywords>
          <priority>P2</priority>
          <bug_severity>enhancement</bug_severity>
          <target_milestone>0.6.6</target_milestone>
          
          
          <everconfirmed>1</everconfirmed>
          <reporter name="Ville Skyttä">ville.skytta</reporter>
          <assigned_to name="Terje Bless">link</assigned_to>
          
          
          

      

      

      

          <comment_sort_order>oldest_to_newest</comment_sort_order>  
          <long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>1825</commentid>
    <comment_count>0</comment_count>
    <who name="Ville Skyttä">ville.skytta</who>
    <bug_when>2004-05-15 06:23:29 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>Many reports about this in www-validator@.

As discussed in the last qa-dev meeting, should we
- Use only generic font families?
- Use no font families at all?</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>1827</commentid>
    <comment_count>1</comment_count>
    <who name="Terje Bless">link</who>
    <bug_when>2004-05-15 12:07:23 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>I nuked all the specific fonts except the Bitstream Vera variants. I&apos;ve also
extracted the common items between headers into one selector so it&apos;s now only
one place to modify the font settings for all headings if we want to further
tweak it.

I&apos;ve also set the variant to small-caps for headings -- despite Bitstream Vera
lacking such a variant -- just to see how it looks. If it looks awkward we can
nuke it before release.</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>1852</commentid>
    <comment_count>2</comment_count>
    <who name="Ville Skyttä">ville.skytta</who>
    <bug_when>2004-05-16 07:17:11 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>FWIW, I don&apos;t personally like small-caps, +1 for nuking it from base.css and
navbar.css.</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>1863</commentid>
    <comment_count>3</comment_count>
    <who name="Terje Bless">link</who>
    <bug_when>2004-05-17 17:14:41 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>An informal poll on IRC was vaguely in fabour of the small-caps, with a caveat
that some fonts are not kind to small-caps variants. Considering the removal of
the specific (ugly) font families a fix for the bug, and the small-caps issue
one of individual taste for now. Closing FIXED and we&apos;ll do the small-caps thing
as needed later (probably by fiddling with the fonts).</thetext>
  </long_desc>
      
      

    </bug>

</bugzilla>