<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes" ?>
<!DOCTYPE bugzilla SYSTEM "https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/page.cgi?id=bugzilla.dtd">

<bugzilla version="5.0.4"
          urlbase="https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/"
          
          maintainer="sysbot+bugzilla@w3.org"
>

    <bug>
          <bug_id>70</bug_id>
          
          <creation_ts>2002-11-22 17:50:28 +0000</creation_ts>
          <short_desc>Accesskeys vs. tabindexes</short_desc>
          <delta_ts>2004-09-15 18:40:18 +0000</delta_ts>
          <reporter_accessible>1</reporter_accessible>
          <cclist_accessible>1</cclist_accessible>
          <classification_id>1</classification_id>
          <classification>Unclassified</classification>
          <product>Validator</product>
          <component>check</component>
          <version>0.6.0b3</version>
          <rep_platform>Other</rep_platform>
          <op_sys>other</op_sys>
          <bug_status>RESOLVED</bug_status>
          <resolution>WONTFIX</resolution>
          
          
          <bug_file_loc></bug_file_loc>
          <status_whiteboard></status_whiteboard>
          <keywords></keywords>
          <priority>P2</priority>
          <bug_severity>minor</bug_severity>
          <target_milestone>0.7.0</target_milestone>
          
          <blocked>856</blocked>
          <everconfirmed>1</everconfirmed>
          <reporter name="Ville Skyttä">ville.skytta</reporter>
          <assigned_to name="Ville Skyttä">ville.skytta</assigned_to>
          
          
          

      

      

      

          <comment_sort_order>oldest_to_newest</comment_sort_order>  
          <long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>155</commentid>
    <comment_count>0</comment_count>
    <who name="Ville Skyttä">ville.skytta</who>
    <bug_when>2002-11-22 17:50:28 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>Validator uses accesskeys 0-9 in its output, makes me wonder if this is a
confusion between accesskeys and tabindexes.  IMO, accesskeys should be letters,
as the current scheme of using numbers limits the range of possible accesskeys
to 10 (0-9).

I suggest changing the current accesskeys to tabindexes (and adding missing
ones), and defining new accesskeys, as letters.

Feel free to assign this to me if you feel I&apos;m right... :)</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>161</commentid>
    <comment_count>1</comment_count>
    <who name="Terje Bless">link</who>
    <bug_when>2002-11-23 20:28:42 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>IIRC the accesskeys were chosen to not conflict so easily with &quot;native&quot; keyboard
accellerators. Reassigning to Ville, setting target 0.6.0 Final, and blocking
Bug #50.</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>180</commentid>
    <comment_count>2</comment_count>
    <who name="Ville Skyttä">ville.skytta</who>
    <bug_when>2002-11-25 15:28:38 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>Duh, good point.  This clearly needs more thought, postponing to 0.7.0.</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>181</commentid>
    <comment_count>3</comment_count>
    <who name="Ville Skyttä">ville.skytta</who>
    <bug_when>2002-11-25 15:29:51 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>Removing blocker on #50.</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>2211</commentid>
    <comment_count>4</comment_count>
    <who name="Terje Bless">link</who>
    <bug_when>2004-09-01 16:33:59 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>Nominating for 0.7.0 release.</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>2347</commentid>
    <comment_count>5</comment_count>
    <who name="Ville Skyttä">ville.skytta</who>
    <bug_when>2004-09-15 18:40:18 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>For those who have already got used to the current accesskeys, changing them
will be an annoying, backwards incompatible change.  And comment 1 is still a
good point, I cannot figure out how to &quot;fix&quot; this and take that into account.

If there are some issues with the tab navigation, that should be handled
separately.  I&apos;m not aware of such issues ATM (but then again, I haven&apos;t tabbed
much in the validator UI).</thetext>
  </long_desc>
      
      

    </bug>

</bugzilla>