6975 2009-05-28 20:56:23 +0000 WS-Transfer needs to define the term 'literal resource representation' 2009-08-18 21:14:19 +0000 1 1 1 Unclassified WS-Resource Access Transfer FPWD All All CLOSED REMIND hasProposal P2 normal --- 1 gilbert.pilz gilbert.pilz dug public-ws-resource-access-notifications oldest_to_newest 25348 0 gilbert.pilz 2009-05-28 20:56:23 +0000 In its description of the wst:Create operation, WS-Transfer makes use of the term 'literal resource representation' but there is no precise definition of this term anywhere within the spec. Experience has shown that this lack of definition may result in interoperability problems. 25526 1 bob 2009-06-09 16:56:48 +0000 Action of Gil due 2009-06-10 25826 2 bob 2009-06-30 11:10:53 +0000 Action 78 25874 3 bob 2009-07-06 14:42:20 +0000 proposal at http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-resource-access/2009Jul/att-0001/6975_6413_proposal_06-01c.doc 25901 4 bob 2009-07-07 19:51:45 +0000 proposal at http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-resource-access/2009Jul/0006.html 25909 5 bob 2009-07-08 06:09:51 +0000 2009-07-07 Resolved with the proposal at http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-resource-access/2009Jul/0006.html amended with the text "Use of this URI indicates that the contents of the Delete element should be processed as specified by the WS-Fragment [WS-Fragment] specification. to "Use of this URI indicates that the contents of the Delete element MUST be processed as specified by the WS-Fragment [WS-Fragment] specification. applied as appropriate where the underlying text appears in all four operations.