6888 2009-05-08 17:38:23 +0000 aria-owns for ATK/AT-SPI and IAccessible2 2009-09-15 14:18:42 +0000 1 1 1 Unclassified ARIA Core AAM 1.0 PC All RESOLVED FIXED P1 normal --- 1 andi.snowweaver dbolter cyns dbolter aria-ua-impl oldest_to_newest 25061 0 andi.snowweaver 2009-05-08 17:38:23 +0000 3.6.3 Relations: aria-owns: explain what to do for ATK/AT-SPI and IAccessible2 Talk to Rich about this. 25084 1 dbolter 2009-05-08 18:39:02 +0000 Firefox exposes RELATION_NODE_CHILD_OF 25085 2 dbolter 2009-05-08 18:53:35 +0000 (In reply to comment #1) > Firefox exposes RELATION_NODE_CHILD_OF > Mappings IAccessible2: IA2_RELATION_NODE_CHILD_OF ATK: RELATION_NODE_CHILD_OF [Aside: Note ideally this should also work when using MSAA accNavigate extensions NAVRELATION_NODE_CHILD_OF] 26281 3 andi.snowweaver 2009-08-06 20:45:46 +0000 The element pointed to by aria-owns exposes IA2_RELATION_CHILD_NODE_OF. Does the element containing aria-owns expose IA2_RELATION_PARENT_WINDOW_OF? 26282 4 andi.snowweaver 2009-08-06 20:48:06 +0000 Rich and I think aria-owns should map to IA2_RELATION_PARENT_WINDOW_OF. Does FF actually do this? Does ATK have a similar relation? 27151 5 dbolter 2009-09-14 18:03:11 +0000 (In reply to comment #4) > Rich and I think aria-owns should map to IA2_RELATION_PARENT_WINDOW_OF. Does FF > actually do this? I think that seems right, and no FF doesn't do this yet (!). > Does ATK have a similar relation? > Yes "ATK_RELATION_PARENT_WINDOW_OF" This is all best captured in our table(s) right? 27180 6 andi.snowweaver 2009-09-15 14:18:42 +0000 The table actually refers to the Relations section (currently 3.6.3).