<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes" ?>
<!DOCTYPE bugzilla SYSTEM "https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/page.cgi?id=bugzilla.dtd">

<bugzilla version="5.0.4"
          urlbase="https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/"
          
          maintainer="sysbot+bugzilla@w3.org"
>

    <bug>
          <bug_id>6806</bug_id>
          
          <creation_ts>2009-04-13 18:58:42 +0000</creation_ts>
          <short_desc>update references</short_desc>
          <delta_ts>2009-04-20 16:47:56 +0000</delta_ts>
          <reporter_accessible>1</reporter_accessible>
          <cclist_accessible>1</cclist_accessible>
          <classification_id>1</classification_id>
          <classification>Unclassified</classification>
          <product>SML</product>
          <component>Core+Interchange Format</component>
          <version>PR</version>
          <rep_platform>PC</rep_platform>
          <op_sys>Windows XP</op_sys>
          <bug_status>RESOLVED</bug_status>
          <resolution>FIXED</resolution>
          
          
          <bug_file_loc></bug_file_loc>
          <status_whiteboard></status_whiteboard>
          <keywords></keywords>
          <priority>P2</priority>
          <bug_severity>normal</bug_severity>
          <target_milestone>---</target_milestone>
          
          
          <everconfirmed>1</everconfirmed>
          <reporter name="John Arwe">johnarwe</reporter>
          <assigned_to name="Virginia Smith">virginia.smith</assigned_to>
          <cc>ht</cc>
    
    <cc>virginia.smith</cc>
          
          <qa_contact name="SML Working Group discussion list">public-sml</qa_contact>

      

      

      

          <comment_sort_order>oldest_to_newest</comment_sort_order>  
          <long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>24700</commentid>
    <comment_count>0</comment_count>
    <who name="John Arwe">johnarwe</who>
    <bug_when>2009-04-13 18:58:42 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>Per the objection raised during AC voting, the PR drafts of the SML and SML-IF specs referenced XML 1.0 4th edition (not 5th, which became current after SML&apos;s specs went through their CR transition).

The working group has discussed this issue several times, and the nuances of various proposals to address it.  As of today&apos;s telecon, there was unanimous consensus to adopt the wording in http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-sml/2009Mar/att-0044/20090330-sml-minutes.html#item06 (Henry&apos;s proposal, re-used from Schema 1.1, plus Len&apos;s change to the end), and to mark this bug editorial immediately once it has been opened.</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>24806</commentid>
    <comment_count>1</comment_count>
    <who name="Henry S. Thompson">ht</who>
    <bug_when>2009-04-17 17:16:47 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>The Schema WG on their call today revised their chosen wording in this regard very slightly, to use &apos;and/or&apos; instead of &apos;or&apos;.  Unless this meets with opposition, I would therefore propose that what this all adds up to is


  XML 1.0
   Extensible Markup Language (XML) 1.0 (Fourth Edition), T. Bray, J. Paoli, C. M. Sperberg-McQueen and E. Maler, editors, World Wide Web Consortium, 16 August 2006.  The edition cited (http://www.w3.org/TR/2006/REC-xml-20060816) was the one current at the date of publication of this specification as a Candidate Recommendation. The latest edition of XML 1.0 is available at http://www.w3.org/TR/xml/.  Implementations may follow the edition cited and/or any later edition(s); it is implementation-defined which editions are supported by an implementation.</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>24809</commentid>
    <comment_count>2</comment_count>
    <who name="Virginia Smith">virginia.smith</who>
    <bug_when>2009-04-17 23:29:33 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>Fixed per comment #1. The WG still needs to approve this final version.</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>24856</commentid>
    <comment_count>3</comment_count>
    <who name="John Arwe">johnarwe</who>
    <bug_when>2009-04-20 16:47:26 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>2009-04-20 telecon: ok to mark fixed + resolved.</thetext>
  </long_desc>
      
      

    </bug>

</bugzilla>