6803 2009-04-10 23:41:41 +0000 RT: Is this functionality required? 2009-07-14 21:35:04 +0000 1 1 1 Unclassified WS-Resource Access ResourceTransfer FPWD PC Windows NT CLOSED WONTFIX hasProposal P2 normal --- 6413 7088 1 geoffbu geoffbu public-ws-resource-access-notifications oldest_to_newest 24657 0 geoffbu 2009-04-10 23:41:41 +0000 Based on recent WG discussions, it is now unclear if the functionality mentioned below is required for RT or if it should be removed. 1)RT 3.2.1 QName Dialect 2)RT 3.2.2 XPath 1.0 Dialect 3)RT Put/Fragment/@Mode 4)RT 4. Faults a)ConcurrencyFault b)InvalidExpressionFault (re-named as 'InvalidExpression') c)GetFault d)ResourceValidityFault e)FragmentAlreadyExistsFault f)PutFault g)PutModeUnsupportedFault h)CreateFault i)InvalidMetadataFault j)MultipartExceededFault k)InvalidPutSyntaxFault 5)Appendix II Resource Metadata Content 6)Appendix II.A Lifecycle metadata 7)Appendix II.B Expression Dialect Metadata Proposal: Remove functionality from RT specification. 25964 1 bob 2009-07-14 21:34:53 +0000 Overtaken by decision to create a fragment spec. Closed without prejudice