6784 2009-04-07 11:18:49 +0000 WebStorage should include Window IDL for Storage APIs 2010-10-04 14:00:09 +0000 1 1 1 Unclassified HTML WG pre-LC1 HTML5 spec (editor: Ian Hickson) unspecified All All CLOSED FIXED P2 normal --- 1 lachlan.hunt ian mike public-html-admin public-html-wg-issue-tracking public-html-bugzilla oldest_to_newest 24603 0 lachlan.hunt 2009-04-07 11:18:49 +0000 The IDL for the localStorage and sessionStorage properties, and the openDatabase() method on the Window object is currently only defined in HTML5. These should be included in the WebStorage spec. 25409 1 ian 2009-06-01 20:12:53 +0000 I'm waiting for WebIDL to have a way to say "this interface bit is just an extension of that interface bit" without having to have casting or a new interface name or anything. Something like: interface A { void foo(); } [Supplemental] interface A { void bar(); } ...which would be exactly equivalent to: interface A { void foo(); void bar(); } (The idea being to not let details of the specification organisation impact the implementation requirements.) 25688 2 ian 2009-06-26 08:30:08 +0000 I'm going to use [Supplemental] 33092 3 mjs 2010-03-14 13:18:45 +0000 This bug predates the HTML Working Group Decision Policy. If you are satisfied with the resolution of this bug, please change the state of this bug to CLOSED. If you have additional information and would like the editor to reconsider, please reopen this bug. If you would like to escalate the issue to the full HTML Working Group, please add the TrackerRequest keyword to this bug, and suggest title and text for the tracker issue; or you may create a tracker issue yourself, if you are able to do so. For more details, see this document: http://dev.w3.org/html5/decision-policy/decision-policy.html This bug is now being moved to VERIFIED. Please respond within two weeks. If this bug is not closed, reopened or escalated within two weeks, it may be marked as NoReply and will no longer be considered a pending comment.