<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes" ?>
<!DOCTYPE bugzilla SYSTEM "https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/page.cgi?id=bugzilla.dtd">

<bugzilla version="5.0.4"
          urlbase="https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/"
          
          maintainer="sysbot+bugzilla@w3.org"
>

    <bug>
          <bug_id>6756</bug_id>
          
          <creation_ts>2009-04-02 16:32:33 +0000</creation_ts>
          <short_desc>3.6.2 what kind of errors are to be reported for invalid aria attribute values?</short_desc>
          <delta_ts>2009-09-15 16:29:48 +0000</delta_ts>
          <reporter_accessible>1</reporter_accessible>
          <cclist_accessible>1</cclist_accessible>
          <classification_id>1</classification_id>
          <classification>Unclassified</classification>
          <product>ARIA</product>
          <component>Core AAM</component>
          <version>1.0</version>
          <rep_platform>All</rep_platform>
          <op_sys>All</op_sys>
          <bug_status>RESOLVED</bug_status>
          <resolution>FIXED</resolution>
          
          
          <bug_file_loc></bug_file_loc>
          <status_whiteboard></status_whiteboard>
          <keywords></keywords>
          <priority>P1</priority>
          <bug_severity>normal</bug_severity>
          <target_milestone>Last Call</target_milestone>
          
          
          <everconfirmed>1</everconfirmed>
          <reporter name="David Bolter">dbolter</reporter>
          <assigned_to name="Andi Snow-Weaver">andi.snowweaver</assigned_to>
          <cc>andi.snowweaver</cc>
          
          <qa_contact name="ARIA UA Implementors">aria-ua-impl</qa_contact>

      

      

      

          <comment_sort_order>oldest_to_newest</comment_sort_order>  
          <long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>24512</commentid>
    <comment_count>0</comment_count>
    <who name="David Bolter">dbolter</who>
    <bug_when>2009-04-02 16:32:33 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>This action item came out of the March 20 UAI TF meeting.</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>24516</commentid>
    <comment_count>1</comment_count>
    <who name="David Bolter">dbolter</who>
    <bug_when>2009-04-02 17:14:03 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>What kind of error reporting were we talking about here? Was it browser console output like &quot;invalid aria-valuenow&quot;, or was it something like reporting a -999 for invalid values (through platform API)?</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>24538</commentid>
    <comment_count>2</comment_count>
    <who name="David Bolter">dbolter</who>
    <bug_when>2009-04-03 16:24:41 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>I guess the related question is what to return if the aria-valuenow is missing (where is shouldn&apos;t be missing).</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>24539</commentid>
    <comment_count>3</comment_count>
    <who name="David Bolter">dbolter</who>
    <bug_when>2009-04-03 16:32:25 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>From today&apos;s call:
Investigate using a null value.
Is there value in raising an event?</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>25078</commentid>
    <comment_count>4</comment_count>
    <who name="Andi Snow-Weaver">andi.snowweaver</who>
    <bug_when>2009-05-08 18:08:06 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>*** Bug 6885 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>25080</commentid>
    <comment_count>5</comment_count>
    <who name="Andi Snow-Weaver">andi.snowweaver</who>
    <bug_when>2009-05-08 18:09:15 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>Cynthia to ask the IE guys what browsers should do in this case

David to find out what Mozilla team does</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>25519</commentid>
    <comment_count>6</comment_count>
    <who name="Andi Snow-Weaver">andi.snowweaver</who>
    <bug_when>2009-06-09 01:20:20 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>From Cynthia via e-mail:

&quot;Don&apos;t use -999 type errors in the API, because these features are too generic to be sure that -999 (or any value) is always wrong.  Error reporting should be done through a console.  We still need to design that, but I don&apos;t think it&apos;s a p1 feature.&quot;

I think we need more here. Seems weird to say what error shouldn&apos;t be returned without saying what should be returned. Keeping this one open for the next editor&apos;s draft.</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>25718</commentid>
    <comment_count>7</comment_count>
    <who name="Andi Snow-Weaver">andi.snowweaver</who>
    <bug_when>2009-06-26 15:27:44 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>06/26/09: No error through API. User agents may return an error through a debug console.</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>27195</commentid>
    <comment_count>8</comment_count>
    <who name="Andi Snow-Weaver">andi.snowweaver</who>
    <bug_when>2009-09-15 16:29:48 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>Re-opened in error.</thetext>
  </long_desc>
      
      

    </bug>

</bugzilla>