6705 2009-03-16 14:54:09 +0000 [Schema Comment] Canonical representation of float/double and number of digits 2009-04-18 02:08:08 +0000 1 1 1 Unclassified XML Schema Datatypes: XSD Part 2 1.0 only PC Windows XP ASSIGNED P2 normal --- 1 David_E3 David_E3 cmsmcq mike www-xml-schema-comments oldest_to_newest 24266 0 David_E3 2009-03-16 14:54:09 +0000 This comment appears in http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-xml-schema-comments/2009JanMar/. This bugzilla entry is so that the WG can track whether or not it has been addressed. It may be a duplicate. Apologies if it is. http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-xml-schema-comments/2009JanMar/0043.html 24267 1 David_E3 2009-03-16 14:55:18 +0000 Dave P. responded: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-xml-schema-comments/2009JanMar/0046.html http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-xml-schema-comments/2009JanMar/0044.html 24269 2 David_E3 2009-03-16 15:00:03 +0000 Michael Kay commented: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-xml-schema-comments/2009JanMar/0045.html 24272 3 mike 2009-03-16 15:02:44 +0000 I suspect this should be classified as "1.0 only" rather than "1.1 only". 24357 4 davep 2009-03-21 00:02:25 +0000 (In reply to comment #3) > I suspect this should be classified as "1.0 only" rather than "1.1 only". > +1 24815 5 cmsmcq 2009-04-18 02:08:08 +0000 The XML Schema WG discussed this issue at today's call and agreed that it seems to relate to XSD 1.0, not 1.1. (XSD 1.1 also allows more than one canonical form for float and double, but it also explicitly states that this is a conscious design decision, to allow any serialization that conforms to IEEE 754.) I'm setting the version info accordingly.