<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes" ?>
<!DOCTYPE bugzilla SYSTEM "https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/page.cgi?id=bugzilla.dtd">

<bugzilla version="5.0.4"
          urlbase="https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/"
          
          maintainer="sysbot+bugzilla@w3.org"
>

    <bug>
          <bug_id>6693</bug_id>
          
          <creation_ts>2009-03-12 23:51:36 +0000</creation_ts>
          <short_desc>[XQuery] Constructor functions for user-defined atomic types</short_desc>
          <delta_ts>2009-03-20 02:00:59 +0000</delta_ts>
          <reporter_accessible>1</reporter_accessible>
          <cclist_accessible>1</cclist_accessible>
          <classification_id>1</classification_id>
          <classification>Unclassified</classification>
          <product>XPath / XQuery / XSLT</product>
          <component>XQuery 1.0</component>
          <version>Recommendation</version>
          <rep_platform>PC</rep_platform>
          <op_sys>Windows NT</op_sys>
          <bug_status>CLOSED</bug_status>
          <resolution>FIXED</resolution>
          
          
          <bug_file_loc></bug_file_loc>
          <status_whiteboard></status_whiteboard>
          <keywords></keywords>
          <priority>P2</priority>
          <bug_severity>normal</bug_severity>
          <target_milestone>---</target_milestone>
          
          
          <everconfirmed>1</everconfirmed>
          <reporter name="Michael Kay">mike</reporter>
          <assigned_to name="Jonathan Robie">jonathan.robie</assigned_to>
          <cc>jim.melton</cc>
    
    <cc>jmdyck</cc>
    
    <cc>jonathan.robie</cc>
          
          <qa_contact name="Mailing list for public feedback on specs from XSL and XML Query WGs">public-qt-comments</qa_contact>

      

      

      

          <comment_sort_order>oldest_to_newest</comment_sort_order>  
          <long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>24218</commentid>
    <comment_count>0</comment_count>
    <who name="Michael Kay">mike</who>
    <bug_when>2009-03-12 23:51:36 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>Appendix C.1, describing the static context, fails to mention that the in-scope function signatures also includes constructor functions for user-defined atomic types in an imported schema. These are described in section 3.12.5.</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>24222</commentid>
    <comment_count>1</comment_count>
    <who name="Michael Dyck">jmdyck</who>
    <bug_when>2009-03-13 01:26:18 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>On the row for &apos;function signatures&apos;, under &quot;Can be overwritten or augmented
by a query?&quot;, after
    &quot;augmentable by module import&quot;
we could insert
    &quot;, by schema import,&quot;
(Ditto in appendix C.2.)

However, people will wonder how a schema import can add functions,
so we might also want to say something in 4.10 Schema Import. E.g.:
    Also, for each user-defined atomic type (if any) in the schema,
    it [the schema import] adds a constructor function [see 3.12.5]
    to the &apos;function signatures&apos; and &apos;function implementations&apos;.</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>24336</commentid>
    <comment_count>2</comment_count>
    <who name="Jim Melton">jim.melton</who>
    <bug_when>2009-03-20 01:58:14 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>*** Bug 6717 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>24337</commentid>
    <comment_count>3</comment_count>
    <who name="Jim Melton">jim.melton</who>
    <bug_when>2009-03-20 02:00:16 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>In their teleconference of 2009-03-17, the WGs accepted the proposal in comment 1. Consequently, I am marking this bug RESOLVED/FIXED.  Because you were present and in agreement with the decision, I presume that you will be comfortable that I am also marking it CLOSED. </thetext>
  </long_desc>
      
      

    </bug>

</bugzilla>