6573 2009-02-13 15:21:54 +0000 Fix URI of recommended MathML2 System Identifier 2010-03-02 18:56:55 +0000 1 1 1 Unclassified Validator Types Registry 0.8.4 PC All RESOLVED FIXED http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-validator/2009Feb/0025.html P2 normal 0.8.6 1 ot ville.skytta cop3252 shelleyp ville.skytta www-validator-cvs oldest_to_newest 23715 0 ot 2009-02-13 15:21:54 +0000 [ Copying from report on www-validator list: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-validator/2009Feb/0025.html ] According to Mathematical Markup Language (MathML) Version 2.0 (Second Edition) W3C Recommendation 21 October 2003 A.2.3 MathML as a DTD Module a document should contain the doctype declaration <!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.1 plus MathML 2.0//EN" "http://www.w3.org/Math/DTD/mathml2/xhtml-math11-f.dtd" But if this is doctype is used the validator at http://validator.w3.org/ gives the following warning: Mismatch between Public and System identifiers in the DOCTYPE declaration This document uses an inconsistent DOCTYPE declaration. The Public Identifier -//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.1 plus MathML 2.0//EN declares the XHTML 1.1 plus MathML 2.0 document type, but the associated System Identifier http://www.w3.org/Math/DTD/mathml2/xhtml-math11-f.dtd does not match this document type. 23752 1 ville.skytta 2009-02-15 17:49:44 +0000 FWIW, http://www.w3.org/TR/MathML2/dtd/xhtml-math11-f.dtd This seems to be a XHTML+MathML (no SVG) DTD http://www.w3.org/Math/DTD/mathml2/xhtml-math11-f.dtd But this seems to be a XHTML+MathML+SVG one. It doesn't mention the "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.1 plus MathML 2.0//EN" public id which is what I gather the OP was using. I don't know if it's a problem to refer to a XHTML+MathML+SVG DTD when one is looking for a XHTML+MathML (only) one. If it is, I suppose it's a bug in the MathML spec. 23820 2 ot 2009-02-18 15:37:15 +0000 Forwarded to Math WG (password-protected link, but for reference, adding it anyway): http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/member-math/2009Feb/0226.html 23822 3 ot 2009-02-18 20:13:31 +0000 (In reply to comment #2) > Forwarded to Math WG Useful and fast reply from David Carlisle: [[ It's for mathml+xhtml, there are some param entities for svg but they are set to ignore as the dtd is built using the xhtml+svh+html modularisation dtd, but tuned for just mathml and html. there's some information about the driver file used at http://www.w3.org/Math/characters/ ]] So it looks like we should indeed be using : http://www.w3.org/Math/DTD/mathml2/xhtml-math11-f.dtd I'll make sure the DTD used by the validator is up to date, too. 24544 4 cop3252 2009-04-03 19:37:00 +0000 What is holding up closing this bug? 27423 5 ville.skytta 2009-09-21 20:07:15 +0000 Fixed in CVS, will be in 0.8.6. The DTD in validator's sgml-lib was already the correct one. 29533 6 ville.skytta 2009-11-12 21:33:54 +0000 *** Bug 8270 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** 32773 7 ville.skytta 2010-03-02 18:56:55 +0000 Fix included in 0.8.6.