6536 2009-02-06 11:52:38 +0000 Time element examples should be in the context of a goal-oriented microformat use case 2010-10-04 14:57:30 +0000 1 1 1 Unclassified HTML WG pre-LC1 HTML5 spec (editor: Ian Hickson) unspecified All All VERIFIED FIXED http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/#the-time-element NoReply P2 normal --- 1 hsivonen ian mike public-html-admin public-html-wg-issue-tracking public-html-bugzilla oldest_to_newest 23496 0 hsivonen 2009-02-06 11:52:38 +0000 See the examples at http://www.whatwg.org/specs/web-apps/current-work/#the-time-element and then compare with http://forums.whatwg.org/viewtopic.php?t=4043 The spec doesn't make it clear that the time element is meant to be useful *if* microformats such as hCalendar adopt it in place of the abbr pattern. Instead of showing semantic markup without any particular purpose, the spec should show examples where the time element is used in hCalendar in place of the abbr pattern, and the examples should be use case-oriented showing calendar items for events that the user might want to copy over to a calendaring app. 23705 1 ian 2009-02-13 07:57:47 +0000 http://www.w3.org/mid/5f37426b0902072303r4eb9803ej5103c659b58ff18e@mail.gmail.com 33051 2 mjs 2010-03-14 13:16:48 +0000 This bug predates the HTML Working Group Decision Policy. If you are satisfied with the resolution of this bug, please change the state of this bug to CLOSED. If you have additional information and would like the editor to reconsider, please reopen this bug. If you would like to escalate the issue to the full HTML Working Group, please add the TrackerRequest keyword to this bug, and suggest title and text for the tracker issue; or you may create a tracker issue yourself, if you are able to do so. For more details, see this document: http://dev.w3.org/html5/decision-policy/decision-policy.html This bug is now being moved to VERIFIED. Please respond within two weeks. If this bug is not closed, reopened or escalated within two weeks, it may be marked as NoReply and will no longer be considered a pending comment.