6463 2009-01-21 14:44:34 +0000 MEX: Attaching Policy to WS-Mex GetMetadata 2010-03-17 11:09:21 +0000 1 1 1 Unclassified WS-Resource Access MetadataExchange FPWD PC Windows XP CLOSED REMIND needsAction P2 normal --- 6721 7728 1 katy_warr katy_warr asirveda bob dug public-ws-resource-access-notifications oldest_to_newest 23206 0 katy_warr 2009-01-21 14:44:34 +0000 We should consider clarifying or recommending how policy should be associated with a WS-MetadataExchange GetMetadata request. ('Policy' might be existing policies such as WS-SecurityPolicy or potential new assertions, as described in issue 6406 here: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=6406). A GetMetadata operation's policy cannot be attached within the Web service endpoint's WSDL because: In order for a client to establish the WS-Mex GetMetadata policy, it would need to issue a GetMetadata(WSDL) request at the web service endpoint...but in order to issue a GetMetadata request at the endpoint it would need to establish the WS-Mex GetMetadata policy... The issue here is: what is the correct way to bootstrap the bootstrap (without entering an infinite loop)? 23757 1 bob 2009-02-16 02:45:09 +0000 General Proposal at http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-resource-access/2009Feb/0000.html 29247 2 asirveda 2009-11-02 01:38:43 +0000 Another proposal at http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-resource-access/2009Nov/0007.html 29867 3 katy_warr 2009-12-01 19:08:30 +0000 Further discussion and proposal: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-resource-access/2009Nov/0020.html 29869 4 asirveda 2009-12-01 19:27:01 +0000 And, some additional discussion at http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-resource-access/2009Nov/0047.html 30021 5 dug 2009-12-08 20:49:30 +0000 Latest proposal: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-resource-access/2009Dec/0012.html 31134 6 asirveda 2010-01-19 19:42:18 +0000 Please find the latest proposal dated Jan 5th at http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-resource-access/2010Jan/0015.html 32866 7 bob 2010-03-09 21:54:05 +0000 resolved with the proposal at http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/ra/10/03/MOAPv2.zip with an additional example and explanatory test (12.2) described in http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-resource-access/2010Mar/0000.html and the addition of an editor's note saying that these parts are still under discussion in the WG at example 9.1, text in 11.1 (nexted policy assertions) and example 8.5