6450 2009-01-19 20:54:22 +0000 schema component positional predicate text inconsistent with EBNF 2009-12-11 16:57:52 +0000 1 1 1 Unclassified XML Schema SCDS: XML Schema Component Designators 1.1 only PC Windows XP RESOLVED FIXED decided P4 normal --- 1 johnarwe holstege David_E3 www-xml-schema-comments oldest_to_newest 23161 0 johnarwe 2009-01-19 20:54:22 +0000 Excerpt from 4.3 Interpretation of Schema Component Paths A schema component position predicate is true if the position of the target component in the sequence of components selected by the axis and name test is equal to the positive integer given in the predicate. The EBNF allows 0 (which is not positive IIRC): [24] Predicate ::= '[' [0-9]+ ']' You might want '[' [1-9][0-9]* ']' although I realize that disallows leading zeros. 23513 1 holstege 2009-02-06 17:29:04 +0000 The WG discussed this comment at the telcon 2009-02-06 and agreed the EBNF could be made more precise: '[' [0]*[1-9][0-9]* ']' 24915 2 David_E3 2009-04-24 17:57:48 +0000 On the telcon, the WG discussed the following proposal. http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/xmlschema-current/SCD/scds-omni20090326-diff.html And adopted it with one ammendment: In section 4.2.1 the sentence first sentence now reads: "The schema component axes defined in this document are considered to be names in no namespace." This omnibus proposal is intended to close: bug 6450 bug 6451 bug 6452 24919 3 johnarwe 2009-04-24 19:46:28 +0000 looks fine, feel free to close this out