<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes" ?>
<!DOCTYPE bugzilla SYSTEM "https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/page.cgi?id=bugzilla.dtd">

<bugzilla version="5.0.4"
          urlbase="https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/"
          
          maintainer="sysbot+bugzilla@w3.org"
>

    <bug>
          <bug_id>6422</bug_id>
          
          <creation_ts>2009-01-14 05:43:13 +0000</creation_ts>
          <short_desc>RT - Introduces An Ad Hoc Boxcarring Mechanism</short_desc>
          <delta_ts>2009-09-30 09:59:19 +0000</delta_ts>
          <reporter_accessible>1</reporter_accessible>
          <cclist_accessible>1</cclist_accessible>
          <classification_id>1</classification_id>
          <classification>Unclassified</classification>
          <product>WS-Resource Access</product>
          <component>ResourceTransfer</component>
          <version>FPWD</version>
          <rep_platform>PC</rep_platform>
          <op_sys>Windows NT</op_sys>
          <bug_status>CLOSED</bug_status>
          <resolution>WONTFIX</resolution>
          
          
          <bug_file_loc></bug_file_loc>
          <status_whiteboard></status_whiteboard>
          <keywords>hasProposal</keywords>
          <priority>P2</priority>
          <bug_severity>normal</bug_severity>
          <target_milestone>---</target_milestone>
          
          
          <everconfirmed>1</everconfirmed>
          <reporter name="Geoff Bullen">geoffbu</reporter>
          <assigned_to name="Geoff Bullen">geoffbu</assigned_to>
          <cc>bob</cc>
          
          <qa_contact name="notifications mailing list for WS Resource Access">public-ws-resource-access-notifications</qa_contact>

      

      

      

          <comment_sort_order>oldest_to_newest</comment_sort_order>  
          <long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>23068</commentid>
    <comment_count>0</comment_count>
    <who name="Geoff Bullen">geoffbu</who>
    <bug_when>2009-01-14 05:43:13 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>The WS-ResourceTransfer specification introduces boxcarring or batching multiple operations within a single SOAP message.  In general, boxcarring causes a lot of problems - especially with transactional rules, sequencing micro operations, fault handling, semantics of the SOAP Action URI - reduces to just &quot;Do Stuff&quot;, etc.

The SOAP specifications do not explain how boxcarring is performed. The WS-ResourceTransfer specification specifies an one-off boxcarring mechanism.

Perhaps work associated with this feature would be better suited to a separate specification, where all the fine details can be worked out and the result can be used by many specs?</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>24217</commentid>
    <comment_count>1</comment_count>
    <who name="Robert Freund">bob</who>
    <bug_when>2009-03-12 17:52:13 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>Highlights that RT should follow idempotency properties of T, then might depend on specification of restrictions as to frags permitted</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>27664</commentid>
    <comment_count>2</comment_count>
    <who name="Robert Freund">bob</who>
    <bug_when>2009-09-26 12:16:12 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-resource-access/2009Sep/0083.html
proposes CWNA</thetext>
  </long_desc>
      
      

    </bug>

</bugzilla>