<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes" ?>
<!DOCTYPE bugzilla SYSTEM "https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/page.cgi?id=bugzilla.dtd">

<bugzilla version="5.0.4"
          urlbase="https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/"
          
          maintainer="sysbot+bugzilla@w3.org"
>

    <bug>
          <bug_id>64</bug_id>
          
          <creation_ts>2002-10-31 03:14:11 +0000</creation_ts>
          <short_desc>Validator does not escape &amp; properly.</short_desc>
          <delta_ts>2002-11-03 20:47:49 +0000</delta_ts>
          <reporter_accessible>1</reporter_accessible>
          <cclist_accessible>1</cclist_accessible>
          <classification_id>1</classification_id>
          <classification>Unclassified</classification>
          <product>Validator</product>
          <component>check</component>
          <version>0.6.0b2</version>
          <rep_platform>All</rep_platform>
          <op_sys>All</op_sys>
          <bug_status>RESOLVED</bug_status>
          <resolution>FIXED</resolution>
          
          
          <bug_file_loc></bug_file_loc>
          <status_whiteboard></status_whiteboard>
          <keywords></keywords>
          <priority>P2</priority>
          <bug_severity>normal</bug_severity>
          <target_milestone>---</target_milestone>
          
          
          <everconfirmed>1</everconfirmed>
          <reporter name="Terje Bless">link</reporter>
          <assigned_to name="Terje Bless">link</assigned_to>
          
          
          

      

      

      

          <comment_sort_order>oldest_to_newest</comment_sort_order>  
          <long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>128</commentid>
    <comment_count>0</comment_count>
    <who name="Terje Bless">link</who>
    <bug_when>2002-10-31 03:14:11 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>Reported by Björn Höhrmann:

  Hey, this is a FAQ and the validator does not do it any better than
Joe Average? I first thought of an Aprils Fool... If a URI submitted for
Validation contains a &amp;, the Validator will not escape it (most of the
time) on the results page, see e.g.

  
http://validator.w3.org:8001/check?uri=http%3A%2F%2Fvalidator.w3.org%3A8001%2Fc
heck%3Furi%3Dhttp%253A%252F%252Fwww.w3.org%252F%253F%2526foo

(validation of validation of http://www.w3.org/&amp;foo).</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>129</commentid>
    <comment_count>1</comment_count>
    <who name="Terje Bless">link</who>
    <bug_when>2002-10-31 03:15:03 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 62 ***</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>131</commentid>
    <comment_count>2</comment_count>
    <who name="Terje Bless">link</who>
    <bug_when>2002-10-31 17:02:16 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>As Björn points out, these aren&apos;t really duplicates; they&apos;re two separate
aspects of a similar general issue.</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>134</commentid>
    <comment_count>3</comment_count>
    <who name="Terje Bless">link</who>
    <bug_when>2002-11-03 15:47:49 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>Ok, we now entity encode the validated URI before output.</thetext>
  </long_desc>
      
      

    </bug>

</bugzilla>