6307 2008-12-13 20:00:52 +0000 equality need not be reflexive? 2008-12-22 15:25:45 +0000 1 1 1 Unclassified XML Schema Datatypes: XSD Part 2 1.1 only All All CLOSED FIXED resolved P2 normal --- 1 davep cmsmcq www-xml-schema-comments oldest_to_newest 22755 0 davep 2008-12-13 20:00:52 +0000 In 1.1 we long ago decided to accommodate NaN != NaN by allowing equality to not be reflexive (not require x = x for all x). In doing so, we failed to delete this parenthetical statement in 2.2.2 (and must do so if they choose to consider them identical) which would require that other applications treat NaN as equal to itself even though we don't. 22826 1 cmsmcq 2008-12-22 15:24:49 +0000 On 19 December the XML Schema WG accepted a wording proposal to delete the parenthetical in question. Accordingly, I'm marking this closed.