<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="yes" ?>
<!DOCTYPE bugzilla SYSTEM "https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/page.cgi?id=bugzilla.dtd">

<bugzilla version="5.0.4"
          urlbase="https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/"
          
          maintainer="sysbot+bugzilla@w3.org"
>

    <bug>
          <bug_id>6280</bug_id>
          
          <creation_ts>2008-12-04 16:45:54 +0000</creation_ts>
          <short_desc>Explicit breaks on table-header and -footer</short_desc>
          <delta_ts>2010-06-03 15:52:12 +0000</delta_ts>
          <reporter_accessible>1</reporter_accessible>
          <cclist_accessible>1</cclist_accessible>
          <classification_id>1</classification_id>
          <classification>Unclassified</classification>
          <product>XSLFO</product>
          <component>XSL-FO</component>
          <version>1.1</version>
          <rep_platform>All</rep_platform>
          <op_sys>All</op_sys>
          <bug_status>RESOLVED</bug_status>
          <resolution>FIXED</resolution>
          
          
          <bug_file_loc>http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/xsl-editors/2007AprJun/0000</bug_file_loc>
          <status_whiteboard></status_whiteboard>
          <keywords></keywords>
          <priority>P2</priority>
          <bug_severity>normal</bug_severity>
          <target_milestone>---</target_milestone>
          
          <blocked>6281</blocked>
          <everconfirmed>1</everconfirmed>
          <reporter name="Tony Graham">tgraham</reporter>
          <assigned_to name="Tony Graham">tgraham</assigned_to>
          <cc>liam</cc>
    
    <cc>vhennebert</cc>
          
          <qa_contact name="Mailing list for comments on XSL (XSl-FO)">xsl-editors</qa_contact>

      

      

      

          <comment_sort_order>oldest_to_newest</comment_sort_order>  
          <long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>22686</commentid>
    <comment_count>0</comment_count>
    <who name="Tony Graham">tgraham</who>
    <bug_when>2008-12-04 16:45:54 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>From xsl-editors@w3.org:

I don&apos;t think it makes much sense to set the break-before and
break-after properties on fo:table-row and children of fo:table-cell
which are themselves children of fo:table-header and fo:table-footer
elements. It might be helpful to explicitely state that in the
descriptions of break-before and break-after.</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>23030</commentid>
    <comment_count>1</comment_count>
    <who name="Tony Graham">tgraham</who>
    <bug_when>2009-01-13 12:45:03 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>Adding original poster as CC since response will be required when a solution is proposed.</thetext>
  </long_desc><long_desc isprivate="0" >
    <commentid>35943</commentid>
    <comment_count>2</comment_count>
    <who name="Liam R E Quin">liam</who>
    <bug_when>2010-06-03 15:51:38 +0000</bug_when>
    <thetext>We agree.

At the end of 7.20.1 &quot;break-after&quot; add,

This property has no effect when it appears on a descendant of fo:table-header or fo:table-footer.

Similarly for 7.20.2 &quot;break-before&quot;.

This property has no effect when it appears on a descendant of fo:table-header or fo:table-footer.


This does not take into account the corner-case of a break inside a table header when table-omit-header-at-break is true - i.e. a break inside a table header or footer that does not repeat is now disallowed.

I have marked this issue as closed; if you feel the resolution is unsatisfactory please reopen it (and say why!)

Thank you</thetext>
  </long_desc>
      
      

    </bug>

</bugzilla>