6253 2008-11-27 22:26:49 +0000 <input> bookkeeping aren't consistent 2010-10-04 14:00:17 +0000 1 1 1 Unclassified HTML WG pre-LC1 HTML5 spec (editor: Ian Hickson) unspecified All All CLOSED INVALID P2 normal --- 1 zcorpan ian mike public-html-admin public-html-wg-issue-tracking public-html-bugzilla oldest_to_newest 22548 0 zcorpan 2008-11-27 22:26:49 +0000 The <input> bookkeeping details aren't scraping friendly in that they aren't consistent. Use-case: http://bugzilla.validator.nu/show_bug.cgi?id=339 (It might be easier to scrape the summary table but I figure it's better to scrape the normative material...) 22550 1 ian 2008-11-27 22:56:19 +0000 They're _supposed_ to be consistent, in what way aren't they? 22551 2 zcorpan 2008-11-27 23:25:29 +0000 I was looking at the first paragraph, where sometimes it was enumerating the allowed attributes, sometimes talking about the value, and sometimes about banned attributes. I didn't realize that there wouldn't be a paragraph at all when there are no allowed common attributes or nothing to say about value... Sorry for the noise.