6231 2008-11-17 13:49:01 +0000 [XSLT 2.0] Default default collation 2010-07-15 08:12:59 +0000 1 1 1 Unclassified XPath / XQuery / XSLT XSLT 2.0 Recommendation PC Windows NT CLOSED FIXED P2 normal --- 1 mike mike public-qt-comments oldest_to_newest 22455 0 mike 2008-11-17 13:49:01 +0000 I was under the impression that the "default default collation" (for XPath eq comparison, etc) was defined to be Unicode codepoint collation. But reading the spec, it says that for the use-when attribute, but it doesn't seem to say it for anything else. Section 5.4.1 points to 3.6.1: The default collationXP is defined by the value of the [xsl:]default-collation attribute on the innermost enclosing element that has such an attribute. For details, see 3.6.1 The default-collation attribute. but neither this nor 3.6.1 says what the rules are in the absence of such an attribute. We ought either to say that the "default default" is the Unicode codepoint collation, or that it is implementation-defined. My preference is for the former (which I had always imagined was what the spec said). This arose from a question on xsl-list today from Vyacheslav Sedov discussing whether it was legitimate to perform Unicode normalization as part of an "eq" comparison. 23684 1 mike 2009-02-12 17:55:09 +0000 The WG felt that this ought to be at least potentially under API control, which means it should be "implementation-defined". Editor to write proposed text. 24238 2 mike 2009-03-13 22:09:12 +0000 Erratum E36 has been drafted to reflect the decision made in principle by the WG. 36886 3 mike 2010-07-15 08:12:59 +0000 Closed. Erratum E36 was published in April 2009.